MES Math Q/A 56: Ionel Dinu's Theory of Aether by @mes on 3Speak
▶️ Watch on 3Speak --- If you have math related questions, I may have answers. February 11, 2026 Wednesday at 10:00 AM PST math science electrogravity aether radiowaves - Summary: - MES Math Q/A pl...
Tags: #math #science #physics #aether #ioneldinu #education #technology #quantumphysics #electrogravity #radiowaves
Click recording, guys, we're live on YouTube, can y'all hear me? Can y'all hear me? All right, can y'all hear me? I'll put it everywhere else on Odyssey, Twitch, Rumble, etc. All right, anyways, we're going to power through the ether theory, keep going, because I learn a lot, and so on. And then also go over, put us everywhere. Let's go ahead, this is on Rumble. Okay, putting all these chats everywhere. All right, anyways, um, and let's see if this should open up the chats, see how this sounds. Hey. Okay, anyways, uh, it should be working fine. Okay, it is recording, everything's fine. They open up this, the chat window on X. All right, anyways, uh, so we're gonna go, uh, straight into it, yeah. And initially, actually, before we go into it, I have some stuff opened up. So, you had some comments on, on Telegram. So one's pretty interesting is what, oh, it's apparently German warfare, Battleground or whatever on Telegram is 25,000 subscribers, and he has, like, part of the UK column, is a big, big alt-media following, is like the South African Joe Rogan. Now he has Simon Shack on the show. Unbelievable, so Simon Shack is the disinfoagent, extraordinary, pushing CGI, 9-11, all that jazz. And then Simon Shack also, now he's apparently a pioneering cosmologist, and turn to argue some sort of weird, weird shaped universe thingy. Anyways, it's pretty absolutely ridiculous. Also, another thing I want to go, yeah, this is a good photo, this is from the moon landing. stuff again, if you haven't seen my other videos, it's like, you have to realize, if you are, if you don't believe the moon landing, that's fine, but if you, if you push the obvious, the mainstream alt media, which is completely another league bogus, like, Marchebel and all that, like, this is three different, this is a photo from overhead, a photo, a high-definition photo here, and this is live TV coverage all matching up the exact same thing, so it's like, it's pretty next level, anyways. I want to go over to this thingy quickly, just because I got tagged here, and then I'll go to it. This person, it's about the moonlining. This right here, he tagged me, he says, this is Suss, what do you reckon? Also, have you seen the bloopers from blooper reels from ISS? There's some doozies in there, wires, harnesses, green screens, glitches. Yeah, you've got to be very careful. This is the one that, he shared this one, I'll play it. So you can... Oh, we'll go with this one. Fix it around cables, and so you need... When people realize it stops floating around, if you have something dropping, that doesn't mean that this stuff's not floating around. So it's just, if you actually, yeah, but I think there's, I think there's nothing actually dropping. All these things to keep your stuff in play. I just want to go over. I want to go to this one, I want to fact check this one here. This is the one that people, I've seen this before, I think he doesn't actually drop anything. This right here. Why is there no noise? I thought there was one without the noise. Here, this one here. All these things to keep your stuff in place. You look for them. Here, this one here. Nothing actually drops, actually. There you go. He's looking for a searcher for it. It was a noise, but it's like, but I want to see the full one, because I think I've seen the full one before. I think actually drops. I just want to see this thing in here. This is a name here. I'll do a reverse search. I'll play this, and then I'll get into this nitty-gritty. He's looking for a searcher for it. Okay, there it is. There you go. It's like these little one clip things, basically, it's a few people don't realize, if that is actually, like, if something actually dropped, as it shouldn't be, it doesn't just prove that they're literally floating around, so that's more, that's bigger, that would be an argument that they're, they have an anti-gravity, like, shield, and all of a sudden they, it was some interference and didn't have some endgravity part there, anyways, tonight, quickly here, and then we'll go straight into this. uh google or um because i i just want to see the original i hate when they don't show the original and then just talk over like stuff uh visual yeah this one here uh this one here there's um again uh all the uh flat earther guys push this same thing i just want to see the full thing what's his name okay this one uh yeah okay this is a screw loose there's a video here And here's the full, I think this is a big full week. Good day, everybody, where's Wally here? Well, Brandon and his crew, they went looking at the ISS today. Him and his crew, they think they're on a winner yet again. Over the Himalaya Mountains at the time. He was used to use the full thing. Malaya Mountains at the time. And we won't stop until Andrea S puts the cover back. The original, and we won't stop, and we did, yeah, yeah. Now, let's play the original. And there's the 35, that 35, 26, and we won't stop until Andrea S puts the cover back. Here, after these panels, uh, it's the urine up Okay, so there's no screw. So, there's no screw. But they didn't stop, they didn't stop and observe with a clear mind. Now let's look again and I want to show you at 36 they wanted a pile of excuses, but this time all we need to do is to point out what he missed. No excuses needed. They were also blind because they wanted to hear and see something, but they didn't stop and observe with a clear mind. Now let's look again and I want to show you at 3610 in the original just a mere 35 seconds after the sound the delinked bolts still there in the top right of the cover. whoopsies, how about that? I'll be, top still there, all the down, the delinked bolts, still there in the top right of the cover, who the cover, it's down 35 seconds after the sound, the delinked bolts, I think it's this part here is, still there in the top right of the cover. Yeah, it is, okay. Whoopsies, how about that, and that's before they get into the whole claims of editing and so forth, that's all that's needed to debunk this, but I think I will keep adding some cuts, because there's, well, Yeah, this is a nothing actually drops, I'll send this one here. Yeah, I'm gonna, let's show this one here. At 208, I'll just say a 208, yeah. Okay, I'll send this one here. You also here. I've seen that before. Nothing actually drops. It just opens up the hatch. Here is the extended cut. Okay, um, let's do this one, and then here's a full tour. The full one point hour video, even if something, uh, magically fell, would suggest the... were using advanced anti-gravity, let's say, advanced anti-gravity, let's say, reduction, but had ran, yeah, had random interference. Yeah, interference zones of normal gravity. This is far-fetched, but more believable than the Flat Earth claims. Then the Flat Earth... I've seen that before at the end. I... Okay, um... Yes, anyways, uh, there's literally none of these. Uh, where's this guy, uh... I have seen a lot, but every single one that I examined closely revealed nothing special. Just all media disinfoil flat earthers. Okay, yeah, anyways, that's that. We have a power through. What else we have in the docket? This is a scammer. We got this scammer, delete, proceed ban, and so on. All right, anyways. I'm going to go, someone in the email before, Fundamentals, this one is comments on ether. Yeah, this guy here, this guy was on a Twitch last time, I just wanted to see if I replied him. This was a math question, he wrote, he said maths. He just has a ginormous 11 pages, but what's the actual thing here? And then this is, uh, enos, uh, enos. Math questions paper. Okay. I'll just say, uh, which question do you need? Which question do you need? All right, anyways, uh, that's that part, um, and now I'm gonna, yeah, it was just, um, this guy's pretty, uh, good that I'll subscribe this flat earth there, anti-father debunking Loma Jumbo. Um, um, yeah, there's an audible click, okay, yeah, there's a click, nothing actually, uh, falls. Yeah, anyways, this is a pretty cool It's like they're literally floating around like this I don't know how anyone can look at this They're literally floating around how can anybody look at this and say hey, there's some sort of CGI or whatnot They literally floating are they in water? Like what are they doing? How do they doing this? Is there wires? Wires for an hour in 10 minutes? Like are you guys insane? Like, he's literally floating. Where's the wire? How's the wire going through? Is the wire changing in, like, three dimensions or something? This guy, where's the wire on here? And then all of a sudden, it goes through this part. He goes through a little loop there. All right. Yeah, so that's absolutely wild there. All right. Okay. Yeah, so anyways, that's that part. Yeah, it's like, how can anybody... Yeah, so that's that. Let's see if a... The scenes were taken the same time, wait, scenes were used what appears to be shirts being pulled by something do look interesting. Okay, have you analyzed photos for consistency? This guy, I'm suggesting they are consistent. So any bakery would have to be... have to be consistent, aka increase of complexity. Yeah, it makes fakery harder. I'll say, uh, not, not yet. So, um... Yes, anyways, uh... being consistent uh yeah i don't know why how this guy see that we could keep going on and on with this anyways um i really don't care uh like this nonsense again it's like especially once i uh show the barts spells a liar and yeah that's uh that's uh anyways oh yeah here's just anyways oh yeah here's just uh i'll be posting stuff in here as i go on um uh live chat okay i'm gonna post this here as well and anyways uh i know gonna power through it's actually good uh a lot of comments in here because i can said and do it, oh, let's just go back to the d'enya part. This one is the email here. Maths, okay, I replied to him, I think it happened there. Okay, um, let's go here. This is, put a figgy there. Okay, I'm getting peeps in here, I'll be back. I was muted. Oh, sorry, I was muted, okay, so I'm Gary Jackson, I'm back. I'm back on, okay, I'm back on. Anyways, I was just chatting, guys, sorry with that. I hadn't muted when I had my nieces were at my daughter, like, slamming it, go and tell them off. Okay, anyways, I'm back, can you all hear me? Hi, Gary, epic stuff, and I think the book should be arriving soon. So, great that you got them on the school, library, and all that. So anyways, I'm gonna go back to this fundamental theory of ether. I'm telling you all this is the big deal. Okay, so now... Last week we ended off, I ended off here when I sent him an email. So I sent email to Eynodino, and I sent right here, said, hi, I know, I just added your updates. Note that I think you made a typo, see screenshot below right here. This attraction between a body negatively charged and one uncharged. This part right here. Excess quantity of vibrating electrician. This should be A, not B. On here, this is excess. So that's going to be very, very negative. And then it, yeah, X is very negative, and then it, and then it goes over here. It connects to this one here that's not vibrating, and it's just normal amount. And the reason it's not vibrating, again, that's why when you, to get static electricity, you need to shake, shake things together. So you need to actually vibrate that electrician, and that's creating that attraction through the ether. Basically, coupled like a metronome. Okay, so also can you explain the part a bit, the part below a bit more possibly with the diagram? This was the one I read earlier, so I said an even stronger argument for the idea that the origin of radio of waves emitted by radio antenna is not the high frequency electric current surging in the antenna. Is the experimental, yeah, yeah, basically another reason that it's not the radio, yeah, basically an even stronger argument that the idea that the origin waves Okay, 21 centimeter flipped spin. All right, um, yeah, picks off. Anyways, not sure what that means. So, an even stronger argument for the idea that the origin of the waves emitted by a radio antenna is not the high frequency electric current surging in the antenna. So basically, the origin is not the current, is the experimental observation that a closed oscillating circuit does not radiate if the current of high electricity, uh, no high frequency flowing in it is such that the diagram flows in all its directions at the same direction at the same time. And, no, the current flows in all its parts in the same direction at the same time, while the same circuit does not radiate, radio waves into the ether, if, no, while the same circuit does radiate into the ether, if the current is made to flow in opposite directions at the same time in different parts of the circuit, and thus creating loops, antinodes of potential along the wires. So basically he's saying, circuits don't radiate if there's high frequency, but then it's a high frequency, though, in such that the current flows in all parts at the same time, in the same direction. Oh, so I think what it means is, if you have a current like this, if you have a circuit and there's current goes through all of it, and then another one comes through all of it, you're not going to have radio waves. So high frequency flowing in such of the current flows in all parts in the same direction at the same time, while the same circuit is not, yeah, but then the same circuit would if you just go forward and back. Yeah, this is, yeah, so I think that's what it means. if the current is made to flow in opposite directions at the same time in different parts of the circuit, that does creating loops, antinodes of that. So this is saying, as long as in the circuit, you have some that it's going opposite. Yeah, I need to see a diagram. So it turns out that, therefore, that it is critical for the mission of radio waves to obtain pulsating antinodes of potential in the antenna. And since the pulsating antinodes of potential are created by pulsating electric charges, and these impinge on the ether periodically. It follows that radio waves, thus created must necessarily be longitudinal waves of compression and rare fraction of ether, in which the pulsating electric charges act on the ether, just like vibrating cone of a loudspeaker acts periodically on the air around it and produces sound waves. All right, so this is part I said, can you explain a bit more? Another question is about the radiation pattern and was wondering, what about the vertical direction? Wouldn't radio waves push outward to space two, or is this diagram just looking at ground receiving patterns? Again, this is from an actual, like, Department of the Army. It's the Army. It's not him making this diagram, it's the Army. So I said, wouldn't, yeah, so I said, what about the vertical direction? Wouldn't radio waves push outward to space two, or is this diagram just looking at ground receiving patterns, and I assume that the gap in the center of the pattern is due to the high-electrogen voltage accumulation? And see how this is spreading across. So this is the current, basically this is the antenna, it goes back and forth, and then the radiation pattern looks like this, which is quite interesting, again, it's from the army. So it's like, yeah, it looks like it's being pushed outwards from that zone there. Radiation pattern produced by a quarter wave antenna. All right, there's, and again, when the voltage is highest, that's the tip, and when current is a minimum. looks like it's being pushed out. So that's what I sent there. And I said, I've added, and there's another part from he argued, you know, from a screenshot I was asking for clarification. I said, I added more such wavefronts in the original figure on the previous page left or below, and I obtained the figure at the right where it can be seen the direction of the propagation of the waves emitted by this antenna is indeed downwards from its tip. So basically, he's saying that if you put in, if it's pushing like this, this is, uh, that in more wavefront. So you're saying the wavefronts are going to be like this. That's the voltage matching up, basically, high compression over here, and then rare fraction. So think of voltage is basically like compressing the electrician, or electricity or electrons into one little area. So basically high potential, high charge. And then that pushes everything outward. So it's high charge, but the current's low, because it's not flowing. It's just all accumulating there. And then the wavefront, he said, will look like this and push downwards like that, because that's interesting. That's an interesting setup. Any clarity would be much appreciate it. Alright, sorry, send him that. And then he replied here. So, so it says, Fundamentals, Fundaments of a Theory of Ether, Part 4. So, hi, Matthew, thanks for the notification of the typo I have corrected it. I've sent you three screenshots, which contains some diagrams from Fleming's book at V3. So he references actual Fleming's diagram. And what I'm going to do is, actually, I think he sent the actual PDF. Yeah, so you send a PDF, and I have this right here. So I'm going to go right here. I might have to just look at this before that I do the streams, dive into this, and then when I do the streams, I go full on. But the thing is this forces me on this. So I send you three screenshots, which contains some diagrams from Fleming's book. I reference that V3, the screenshots OO2C says exactly what I wrote about, wrote in my article, but radiation and non-radiative close oscillating circuit. you can produce along the same wire straight or loop electric currents that flow in opposite directions if you use an alternating power supply of high frequency. Okay, so basically you're saying you need electricity going forward and backward. It has to go in opposite directions in that same circuit. At low frequencies, your current is in the same direction all along the wire, and then reverses due to reverse of the polarity of the power supply. But if the power supply switches polarity much faster, the charges along the wire do not have time to switch direction, and you end up with currents of flow along the wire in different directions at the same time. The ones, so this is interesting, at low frequencies, your current is in the same direction all along the wire, and then reverses, it goes there, and then reverses. But if the power supply switches polarity much faster, the charges move along the wire, do not have time to switch direction, and you end up with currents have flow in the same direction, in the same wire in different directions at the same time. but how do you have different... Oh, yeah, because if you have some going backwards, some forward. If you don't have to switch direction, then you end up the currents of flow along the same wire in different directions at the same time. The ones that flow in the previous direction and the ones produced next to them by the power supply that has switched to opposite polarity, it is like sloshing water in a tank so fast that the water does not have time to flow from end and you produce water rays. If these waves are... a very high frequency, then they can set the air above them in vibration and can produce sound propagating a wave vertically perpendicular to the water surface. In the case of the wire, these waves are due to the accumulation of electricity on its surface and then push on the surrounding ether and create radio waves. In the paper I reference to these waves, yeah, to these waves, in the paper I referred to, these waves as being... produce similar to a loud speaker, the vibrating cone, and the loudspeaker pushes on the air while the vibrating electrician on the wire pushes antenna on the ether. So again, this is, but the thing I'm trying to wrap my hand around, because you have a wire, this one is a speaker literally…