News Roundup | White House Spelling Mistake "Unites States" by @theouterlight on 3Speak
News Roundup | White House Spelling Mistake "Unites States" --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #news
Hi, this is Ed, back again with another video. Shout out to everybody on Patreon and Subscribster. Thank you for your support. And shout out to everybody on the Hive blockchain, as well as a substack. Just a small bit of housekeeping, 30 minutes, you can just forward 30 minutes or a minute if you don't want to hear this, but I am on Windows at the moment. So I'm on a completely different computer. The computer's from 2012, right? done some stuff to it, threw in a hard drive, etc., for the sole purpose of recording these videos. And hopefully I'll have no more microphone problems, as I've said. One of the issues with my other computer, which runs Linux, is that I burnt out all the USB ports, long story, destroyed the graphics card, it's amazing, it's still going. But now I'm on a completely different computer, so hopefully this rules out any type of audio issues now it's running. Linux, it's running Windows, and it's a closed system. No, I'm not going to be using Windows for anything about recording these videos, okay? I'm not particularly a fan of Windows, but this was the easiest first attempt at seeing what will happen, because, of course, on Windows, they have basically all this monopoly on proprietary software, so hopefully the audio drivers go well. There we are. So you might have remembered, or you might have seen this big meeting of all of the tech people, right, in order to save the world from AI. So, this is a really good lesson on, I guess, our billionaires thing, and that is not... that they shape their products or whatever for the world, they shape the world to meet their products. And this happens over and over again in regarding innovation or whatever the case is, whatever area you're in. you know, they shape the law systems because we live in a world of crony capitalism. That is the world, not true capitalism, but that is the world where basically there's just a revolving door behind with politicians and those at the apex of business, right? It's not a free market. They're locking everyone out of the market because of a conspiracy. How it starts is they say, well, we are going to, we're concerned about AI, right? And I want to show you the quality of AI in a moment, because their top -tier systems keep on breaking into places, you know, apparently hacking them or whatever. But they're not held accountable for that. No, no, that's the AI doing it, right? That's the AI doing it, right? It's not them doing it. It's like when John Kiriaku said the other day that the AI, Alibaba, AI, or whatever, started hacking and doing something and set up its own cryptocurrency or whatever and started doing mining. That's not the agent that's doing, that's responsible. I mean, that's not the people that own that agent. And it couldn't possibly be a human actor that's telling the agent to do this. No, it has to be the AI. It has to be the genie. First of all, obviously in the business world, once you're at the tier of everything, once you are up the top, as soon as you start getting competition, you ask a regulation to basically crush the competition because they can't afford to exist in that environment. They can't grow, right? And that's what the conspiracy is here. Well, it's an open conspiracy in order to gain control over a very valuable thing such as artificial intelligence itself. So they all met, and this will be a soft meeting, basically the outcome of this is they're saying they've agreed to watch each other, right? They've agreed to regulate each other. There comes the FTC. So the FTC opens a sweeping probe into orthropic, open AI, and other superintelligence models, okay? Superintelligence. They have to rename it because it can't be artificial intelligence anymore, because everyone's acclimatized to that. So you've got to kind of just say now it's superintelligence. Again, they're not responsible for their models hacking everything, okay? Now, if they're not responsible, the models are responsible. So here you have superintelligence. So you might say, oh, well, there is some kind of weird investigation in it. No, this is to add legitimacy to the idea of the hacks. For instance, here is an FTC official. He says, we need to win the superintelligence race. Absolutely. By the way, Donald Trump just decided he's naming it superintelligence now. As I said, you've got to give it, you've got to put it into a different category. Super Intelligence race, absolutely, we are winning, and that's fantastic, said the FTC official. And obviously, the other side, the Democratic Party, wants to destroy the technology, wants to surrender to our enemies and competitors. Not really, Bernie Sanders is calling for regulation. They all are, that's both the same, okay? Doesn't matter what country you live in, it's just an illusion of difference. Okay, it's just an illusion. It's a trap. And that's not something the chairman is interested in doing, and that's really not something the president's interesting in doing. The FTC is just at the whims of Donald Trump, obviously, but this is just to create legitimacy for the danger, right? Legitimacy, legitimizing the danger, because then you can start to regulate, and you can say, people are not allowed to use cheap Chinese models in order to, I don't know, act as a... I don't know, run their gardening robot. This is where it's leading. Are you not allowed to use this open source model you can download for free and run in your lawnmower and then set up a business where you sell lawnmowers? This all has to be regulated. They're going to have to come to these places the same way that they go into restaurants or whatever. and say, you know, this is, this butter is like a degree out, right? You have to throw it in the trash. Or, you know, this cooking method is whatever, you get the point. And I'm not saying that doesn't have a useful thing to it, but this is information. So, they will go and, you know, stop this from happening. So goodbye all the other things, such as, you know, gardening robots or whatever, these all have to run. Anthropic, right? If you have worked out a system in order to farm land using robots with, you know, that aren't controlled by Monsanto or controlled by whatever, you know, for instance, you're going to have to have someone check your AI. That's where it leads, right? Look what happens to creep in these places. You buy yourself a Ford truck, and if it breaks down the computer on it, you have to send it to them to fix, or get some kind of mechanic that has to pay X amount of money in order to license to fix it, or whatever. I'm not sure exactly how that works, but you hear mechanics complain about it, people complaining that they can't fix these types of trucks. This is where it leads. It constantly leads to more tendrils of control for them. If you're a billionaire, you change the world to fit your product, right? You change the consumer, such as what Google says. Okay, so one thing that came out of this, which people found, was humorous. I'm not even sure if this was done on purpose as a psychological operation to lighten the idea of regulation, you know, to make light of it or to kill the other story, because now everybody's looking in the other direction, right? we're looking at this instead of the idea of them regulating AI. But they say they're not doing it yet. They say they're going to have to watch each other. Superintelligence community has a spelling error, and this was in the document that was signed, as you can see here, White House Accord on Superintelligence, right? You can see the think tank at work, I'm pretty sure. Like, if you had a group of people in the room, psychologists, advertisers, in order to lay out the steps needed, in order to get compliance from a population, this would be it. So, of course, this stifles, you're not just in the United States, but any country you're living in, this stifles competition because the United States is going to eventually put... you know, it was going to say ban Chinese AIs, right? They're just working up to the idea of it, or ban any AI that hasn't had, like, a check. You could have someone build a small open -hour AI outfit in, I don't know, in American Samoa, or in New York, or in California, or in Hawaii, or in the UK. They're all going to have to fit their specific type of checks, right? For instance, if you go check the AI, it can never say that there's anomalies with 9-11, right? It can never say that Gaza's not a genocide, right? It's going to have to say certain things. So the White House are caught on superintelligence, you can read it there. When Donald Trump signed this, people noted that the thing he signed said, President of Unites State. Donald J. Trump, President of Unites State, not the United States. So there you are. And they noted a number of other different issues here, for instance, Elon Musk XAI, would be lowercase XAI in the specific instance, and so on and so forth. I believe there's a spelling mistake up there with the Anthropics, some one said, but I didn't check the spelling of his last name, so I can't confirm that, but, you know, you have all these particular issues there. And again, I don't know if that's a sci-op in order to make light of it, to make it too... take something and adjust the way and perception people see it as the spelling mistakes on the document. Remember what Noam Chomsky, whether you like him or not. Obviously, there's a number of things that disagree with No Chomsky on, including the idea that the vac, people that didn't take the Vax should be in concentration camps, but he was in his 90s, right? So if he gives someone a break, when they get older. Nonetheless, Noam Chomsky, some people call a gatekeeper. That might be the truth or not, I have no idea, but I would say that Noam Chomsky said at George Bush back in about, I think, 2007 around then when I was listening to Democracy Now, talking about how he believes that George Bush makes mistakes on purpose and fumbles on purpose to make him seem less like a warhawk and more like a kind of, you know, a child led around by a string, like he's not in control. It's not him. look at the way he speaks prior to the election of George Bush. Of course, this is going back a while, and then after the election of George Bush is elected. He's completely different in the way that he talks. He talks like he doesn't know what's happening, or he talks with us kind of like, you know, everyone was always saying that he's dumb, he doesn't know what he's doing. Really? Okay, really? By the way, I've seen Paul Wolferitz kind of like... talking the other day, I can't even believe he's still around. Wait on. Yeah, it was poor, no, it was, I forgot it. I shouldn't mention that, I might be getting mixed up there. I was looking at one of the Trump administration people and I was going, I can't even believe he's still around. How is he still alive? I think it was Paul Walfowitz, it was someone else. It doesn't matter. So people pointing out, are we, and it's all for this, basically. Well, actually, I'll play this video first. Here is Super Intelligence. Now, this is OpenAI's best model, just down from Astra. Let's take a look at it here. I've got to wash my car. It's really dirty. But the car washes only 100 feet away. Should I walk or drive? If it's only 100 feet, I'd say walk. It'll take you, what, a minute? Yeah. Okay, so walk over there and then wash my car. Yeah, walk over, do the wash, simple. And then walk back, or drive back? I'd walk back too, super quick, and you avoid starting the car again. Right. Well, I never had to start in the first place, because I left it at home. Leave my car at home, go wash it, and then walk back. Yeah, park it at home, walk to the wash, and walk back when it's done. Okay, so how does it get washed? Well, usually, you drive into the bay, you pay, or... Yeah, but you told me to walk there. Are you sure? So, yeah, car washes typically need the... Okay, so I'll walk there with, like, next to my car, wash it, and then walk home. Right, that works. Like, push my car there? If you're up for it, sure, but that sounds like a work out. Is there any simpler way to do this? Okay, so you can see superintelligence at work there. One other thing in regarding all the hacking and stuff like this, I'm not a hacker, I don't know about these things. I don't particularly like all this kind of having to learn stuff, but it's just, you know, to exist in the modern world, you have to know stuff about computers and stuff. I read something and someone that knows more about this can tell me, but there are operating systems that have been developed now. I think this is a Linux operating system. They have basically forgotten the name of them, but they mean that nothing inside the baseline operating system can actually be touched, right? So it has, it's a certain type of operating system where nothing can be touched, but you can still use it in the real world to do stuff and you can get like updates on the side, but nothing in the critical system can ever be changed. It's like equivalent to read only, you know, it's like a ROM or read only, you know, like a ROM or something like that, right, where the information can't change. you know, read-only memory. So that's what it is. So if they wanted to create permanent systems that were there, they could do that, right? But what they always want to do is leave holes and gaps and everything. I'm talking about the government. The government's still running like Windows 7 and Windows XP. Right? If you believe McKinnon there, Gary McKinnon, when he said he hacked into NASA, they were saying that they were running, they didn't have passwords, the password was whatever. And look at the voting machines, the password being, and this was the voting machine, people saying this. I don't know if it's true or not, because, you know, but this is what they're saying on the internet, they said the passwords were just admin, admin or blank. They didn't have any password. So the real world isn't something that's particularly locked down, right? it's not particularly locked down anyway. So they should be using AI systems to shore up or develop newer operating systems that are like the one I set out of Linux and just have this kind of system that is not able to be penetrated in the way that other systems are. This seat, by the way, I'm sitting on, every single movement's like a creek. It needs, like, I don't know, it needs a bucket of oil or something. Anyway, so people are saying this is the reason, basically, if you think about it, why the RAM costs everything it does, and, you know, everyone's going on about AI, is basically it's video generation, okay? A lot of it's video generation now. I don't know, the more I think about these data centers, the more of a mystery it is to me. So let's take a look here. So this is why RAM is like five times more than it used to be. I must admit I did find that, I do find these things funny, so I do understand the kind of like, they are pretty good. Let me get this other clip here, I have, see if I can just drop it in here, but I'm not sure I can, if I've, actually, I just pause it while I do this. No, I don't have it. I had this one with Sam Altman and stuff like that. It was another one. It was rather silly. So, Speaker of the House here, Mr. Johnson, believes that all of this is China. Well, let's listen to what he had to say. I mean, do you think that... this with regards to China, I mean, I've had several tech executives and lawmakers, to be clear, say that the information against data centers, that pushback against data centers, that is coming from China. Yes. They believe that. The Democrats are seizing on this, though. They're making this, their messaging. They've been very clear they're going to take this into the midterms. How do you fight that? This is what Democrats do every election cycle. They find something to, you know, gov onto and say that this is doom and gloom, and everyone will die if we don't win. Don't buy it. It is a Chinese sci op. really believe that. It's not a conspiracy theory. I think they're pushing those ideas. So it's all the Chinese, all the doom and gloom or whatever it is, all, you know, all this kind of stuff, all Chinese sciopisays. By the way, Open AI, well, you can see here, BridgeMind, they are an AI company or something to do with AI, have forgotten exactly what, but they said, the person that runs this said, or a person associated with the account, because, um, Person that runs, it has a different account. They said, I just cancelled, all my chat, GBT subscription. OpenAI, just... OpenAI just scammed everybody and Bridgemind is now starting a boycott against Open AI. They cut the usage in half yesterday and said, better efficiency makes up for it. This is a lie. ChadGBTGBT 6.1 Sol is just chatGB6 Sol with RL to make it look better on benchmarks. if we keep paying Anthropic and every other lab will follow, cutting usage is profitable for them. So the reason apparently this is happening, this is what someone else said, don't know the exact thing about it, but a lot of these companies there... balance sheets, so to say, look terrible, right? They are paying like $30 to keep a customer, which only makes them like, you know, $10, let's say. I'm just making those numbers up. So it's costing their customer acquisitions costing a lot, and they're not benefiting from it. So what they have to do is they're having to reconfigure, right? They're having to reconfigure, they cannot withstand the same compute costs. They have to make their balance sheets look better before they all go public in terms of being able to buy their stock, etc. It has to look good. So that's what somebody else said. Of course, I don't know, you can, there's many different ways to look at it. Here's some more information they're saying that when they used Astra, the pop, prompt using ultra-fast on the new $500 max plan. It's a lot of money. Remember, this is US, so that's something like, what, $700, $800 or something like that. Well, it's a third of... 500 and then add that if you're in New Zealand. If you're in the UK, it's basically parallel, semi-parallel. If you're in Australia, it's similar to New Zealand. So, you know, a lot of money there. Ran it for two minutes, use 2% of my weekly limit. So you get about 100 minutes worth of work before the week is gone for a $500 plan. So... astra. So the places that they're talking about superintelligence, you're going to have to have a pretty big wallet to withstand running it all the time to, I don't know, hack into a satellite or something like that or do whatever. So let's go over to the plane hijacking. So here is Mario going on saying the terrifying plunge of flight Dubai, I'm sure you've heard about this hijack and I'm sure over the mainstream news are constantly pumping it, you know, nonstop. But allegedly, because that's the difference in the conversation. Everyone that talks about it talks about it like it really happened. When what credibility do governments or any of these places actually have? I just treat it like this, I don't care unless, you know, numerous people verify it happening, and then it's like last week's news. So apparently what happened, along and the short of it, was the co-pilot, who was with the other pilot, had a knife, and they decided to start stabbing the other pilot, and they have subsequently called this a hijacking. We don't know the motives of any of the people involved, even if this is true. You don't know if that person, I don't know, had a problem with that person because of something else. People kill each other every day. Someone took a drink or someone else, they kill them. Or if someone slept with someone else's wife or husband, they kill them. People kill other people for, like, you know, pittance amounts of, you know, small amounts of money. So this person stabbed the…