news roundup | Trump: "I was pulled from the ruble of ground zero" by @theouterlight on 3Speak
news roundup | Trump: "I was pulled from the ruble of ground zero" --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #news
Hi, this is Ed, back again with another video, shout out to everybody on Patreon and Subscribe Star. I am on a new mic, which is the $10 USD or $10 American microphone I bought, which was about $17 New Zealand from Timo, actually. So we'll see how this microphone goes, hopefully there's less popping, etc. and we'll see if it's better than the more expensive snowball microphone I have. And again, then we'll know if it's my computer or not, which of course, has all its USB ports fried via a rendezvous with a converter, an IDE converter from China, which wanted to be plugged into a wall socket in order to work. They should have been the first warning sign. So here we are, Donald Trump claims he was pulled from ground zero after 9-11. Mother Jones saying Trump falsely suggests he was pulled from ground zero. Falsely suggests, let's take a look at the club here. Two firemen, we thought it was coming down on top of us and two firemen. Big, strong guys, and I'm not the smallest guy in the world. They grabbed me under the arms, they got to get out of here. And they literally lifted me up. This is not easy to do. I'm big. They lifted me up, and they started running with me. I said, fellas, I can run myself. But they were amazing, but they thought it was coming down. It didn't come down, US Steel. So there he says in regarding being pulled from ground zero. pulled from the rubble, he said, covered, I guess, and dust and things of that nature. Of course, he has won the war 50 times as well. Anyway, some people calling that a lie. They're not couching it in mostly claims or seem to exaggerate his role. Some people are saying that that's just a blatant lie. So Ted Cruz was asked if Donald Trump was falsifying his account of being pulled from the rubble of Ground Zero. By the way, there is no historical evidence whatsoever that Donald Trump was even at Ground Zero at the time of, you know, collapse, so on and so forth. He was there the day after, in a suit and tie, where he claimed that he had 100 workers there, which was, once again, proved to be a fabrication. He never had no one there. But he came down to say that he was showing solidarity. This is in a video, to the 100 workers he had down there at ground zero. Had no one down there at ground zero. That was proved to be false. That's why I say... People say that Donald Trump's mind is in decline, and I say, no, he's always been like that. I just played a video the other day where he said his future wife, Molina, was from Austria. Take a look at Ted Cruz, who cannot even answer a simple question. It is comical, but let's take a look. At first, the Secret Service agents said, stay where you are, and then they ran through the hallways, and they said, get out now, Ron, don't walk. She was at the U.S. Trade. President's 9-11 story today, he's saying that there is evidence that he was there right after. I mean, he's kind of making it sound like he was pulled out of the rumble, though, with the... firefighters, do you think that's appropriate? September 11th was 25 years ago. It was a horrific moment for our entire country. And you could doubt whatever you want about Donald Trump, but the man is a New Yorker. He loves New York, and I have every doubt that what he's conveying there is what he experienced, and that was a traumatic experience for all of us. Yeah. That's basically the Tina Rov's reply, which is a non-reply. It just folds back on the idea of compliments, right? Holding back on the idea, subservent idea of compliments without actually criticism. Oh, he's in New Yorker, he loves New York, whatever. If he has no credibility, for instance, Donald Trump, like if he has no credibility, if he's proven to be a liar, he's claiming he's at ground zero, you decide. But if he's consistently lies. You know, the straits open, the straits closed, the straits open, the straits closed, they've won the war 50 times, among many other things, such as being pulled from the rubble of ground zero. If he's proved to be a liar, then why would you take anything he says with any credibility whatsoever? All it is is instruments of manipulation at that point. It's got nothing to do with somebody... replying to you, giving their respect to you, that, you know, they're trying earnestly to tell the truth, or they're trying to give an accurate account of what happened to them. What's surprising is somebody would make statements like that, when on the historical record is knowing that Donald Trump was not at ground zero. Historically, right? Here he is, and he was posting, he actually posted, like a book reply, to, I think it was the New York Times or something that said he wasn't at Ground Zero or whatever newspaper, right? Whatever you think of the Times. And it was like a phone book. It was just, oh, you know, this diatribe of information about how he was at Ground Zero or whatever the case is. And then later on, as proof to this, he posts a couple of videos of him not being pulled from the rubble, but, you know, talking to press outside of Ground Zero. Here he is a day after down at Ground Zero. This is around the time where he says he came down to express solidarity to the hundreds of workers he had at Ground Zero, which he didn't have. There he is there. Of course, he's got a nice, as people say it, a nice clean suit. So it's not like he's in there with the shovel, is it? By the way, all of this ear, that surrounds there is all laid in with asbestos. It's all asbestos here. One of the main things, insurance and things of that nature, prior to the buildings coming down, was the fact is that the buildings would have to be cleared of asbestos, which was going to cost a lot of money. But instead, they came down, and Larry Silvanstein, collected a huge amount of insurance money, happens to be a friend of Donald Trump. So, going along these lines, people were posting memes like this, where Donald Trump was rescuing people from the Titanic. I mean, in terms of being a diplomat, and, you know, the role of President of the United States, apart from... running the country is a diplomatic role as well. As a C of diplomats, he decides upon what type of policy or how other countries are going to be treated. Being a person that has no credibility and lies is extremely detrimental to that post. Now, you might say lots of presidents lie, yeah. But very, really, as blatant as that. and provably false, right? Remember that correspondence who said, correspondent, who said that they exited the helicopter and ran somewhere under machine gun fire? Remember that and the controversy surrounding that? I mean, you know, is there going to be any controversy around this, I don't know. But there is Donald Trump, uh, apparently saving people from Ground Zero, he's in there with his gloves and digging the rubble out of the way. There's Trump at Iwo Jima and Trump in a manger. By the way, let me just tell you saying very quickly. You see this kind of popping effect that you see in the background here of these AI-generated images. It's kind of a pimplein effect. It's a way that the images are rendered using this type of mesh system, how I understand it. Like this kind of mesh system where you get this kind of pimplein effect. And it's in all three images. For instance, you can see the parts of the building there, and you can see it's kind of like and carve it in this strange pimplein effect. as well as everything as the clouds, they come out like little pieces of, you know, cotton swab. This is something in chat GPT, which seems to be unfixable. It's been happening for a few years or a year now. And if you create assets in chat GPT, I don't subscribe to chat GPT, I just have a free account, which I test now and then. But when you do go in there and create an image or something and get this type of pimplein effect, this seems like something they cannot change or fix and wrecks all images. Who wants to use any of these images? Well, maybe just to throw around a meme now and then, but apart from that, you can see the same thing with this image right here, this kind of pimplean effect over everything. But the other thing is, let's be real. Real images taken by real photographers or people that draw real things, they have an electricity about them. Humanness in the Zieggeist, the soul, which is unexplainable to me, in terms of what that is, but it definitely is in stuff. The longer I look at AI images, the more empty, vacuous they are. Don't get me wrong, if you are a... a designer, you can take assets or use assets, maybe you need a hat, maybe you need to put a hat on something, maybe you need to, I don't know, put something behind something. Yeah, sure, you can make something look nice, but that is with a huge amount of human effort and work that goes into it. You know, creating this kind of collage of different skill sets that you're using, including some type of, like, maybe an asset from AI or something. I don't know, maybe you have a car and you want to turn the wheels into, like, hamburgers. That's about the extent of human prowess now, isn't it? It's like, yeah, all of those energy. I don't believe that data centers, as I've said. They might be, you know, have a glossing of that effect. maybe they are wired to that effect, but there's something going on. You just don't need that many data centers, but think of how much energy is put into AI and how the power bill continually is going to climb to run these things because it will create energy scarcity. And for what? To put some hamburgers on, hamburger wheels on a car? To... change the head off your boss into, I don't know, Mario or browser of, you know, Mario Brothers. What exactly is it used for? What, so your boss can write you a letter with chat GPT? Because he can't be bothered doing it himself because, I don't know, he's a hangover. It's kind of comical, isn't it? It's comical. By the way, it's never going to replace the workforce. It will replace things where mathematics are involved, and you can replicate, such as transferring CAD designs eventually, right, creating CAD designs of something you scan in, but that's really an extension of a tool. Obviously, people that can use CAD very well will probably have to check these designs, because the measurements are going to be out. I can almost guarantee that. But, you know, it'll take some jobs like that. Largely you can't trust it with anything. You can't trust it with anything. There's nothing you can trust it with anything at all. I'm surprised at the level of belief in it, once you get to use it and you know it. By the way, people point to self-driving cars. That's like a matrix of other technology. It's not AI. There's AI there. But that's a whole bunch of different technology sensors and different stuff like that, and classical technologies to make it work. So anyway, there is Donald Trump, as you can see there. By the way, another little... criticism which is building, and that is the fact that Donald Trump may have broken federal law, apparently, according to the international business times, not that laws mean anything anymore. Laws don't mean anything. He sells advanced access through true social to 100k a month to his posts so someone at a Bloomberg terminal can microtransaction on it. That's inside of trading. Right, you have to pay $100,000 for that information. Why not just did a letter, news letter from the White House? But the saying he broke, or mighter broke federal law, and this is by giving Natalie Harp and two other female aides $45,000 each in gifts or holiday gifts. Well, my question is, okay, gives them gifts like that, but what about the male aids? Do they get any gifts at all? Probably not. I would say, almost guarantee that they didn't get any gifts at all. Maybe they've got a trump pen. Some people were saying that Ivanka needs to read the room. Ivanka Trump got 19.4 million views on this post on X, but no one can reply to it. The reason why they're saying that Ivanka and all these people need to read the room is that these are what other people are saying. I don't necessarily agree with this. I think it just doesn't matter if you're wealthy or not, just post what you want, but I can see their point. And that is the point that people are making, saying that You know, when they can't afford groceries, when they can't afford gas, when they can't afford anything, and they're just working themselves to the bone, when a lot of people are sick and miserable now. By the way, great work there to Operation Warp Speed, which Trump says is fantastic. So you have Ivanka Trump here riding your horse. doing a Superman pose to the soundtrack of Coldplay's, what's the name of it here, I can't remember, it's a great song. Well, whatever. I forgot the name, you can go look it up. But to the soundtrack of that anyway, we'll go through some of the lyrics. And she's riding her horse on a private beach, most likely. a private beach, my guess would be. It's the only way that you'd have that much freedom, right, because she is the president in the United States's daughter. So there would be security risk constantly, there would be security issues, but if you can ride your horse freedom with, I think, only one other person taking a video of you, you're on a private beach, right, a secure location. and she's flying along there doing the Superman pose, looks happy, you know, and good, you know, it's nice to be happy. Someone can't be happy. But going along there with the Superman pose, riding their horse, and the music and people are saying it's kind of tone deaf in times like these, what do you think? Let's play the video here. I think she kind of got the music choice wrong, but what do I know? Actually, you know what I would say is if you don't. It's fine, but the lyrics mean something definitely, let's take a lot. There's no doubt that Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump are the most powerful people on the planet Earth. Jared Kushner is definitely one of the most powerful people on planet Earth. Some people say is the driving force behind Trump. So the overall tenor of the song, which is linked to that, is the fall of empires and the fall of rulers, if you listen to the lyrics, right? For instance, I hear Jerusalem's bells are ringing, Roman cavalry, choirs are singing, be my mirror, my sword and my shield, my missionaries. In a foreign field, for some reason I can't explain, I know St. Peter won't call my name. Never an honest word, but that was when I ruled the world. When I ruled the world. Talking about, you know, St. Peter, the Gates, right? And that you're not going to get in there. Also the line, but... Never an honest word. And each kind of section has this kind of, uh, same kind of lamentation of a leader, uh, spelling their feelings to the sky about basically their demise. Every one of them. But that's what Ivanka chose for the song. Now, the song is a great song. I just can't remember its name at the moment, but I have listened to it a bit. That's why I knew when I listened to it, I thought, oh, she's never actually read the lyrics of that song. Because a while back, I looked them up. And, you know, well, for instance, here's another chorus, this is verse 3. It was a wicked and wild wind. blew down the doors to let me in, shattered windows and the sound of drums, people couldn't believe what I'd become, and revolutionaries wait for my head on a silver plate, just a puppet on a lonely string, and who would have ever want to become, want to be king? So you can talk about the French Revolution. I think there is references there to a silver plate, the ornate, or shattered windows, you know, of the palace there, you can, a lot of them you probably can reference some more classic verses, I used to rule the world, seas would rise when I gave the word, now in the morning I sleep alone, sweep the streets I used to own. Another verses, I used to roll the dice, feel the fear in my enemy's eyes, listen as the crowd would sing, now the old king is dead, long live the king. One minute I held the key, next the walls were closed on me, and I discovered that my castles stand upon pillars of salt and pillars of sand. It's a brilliant song. It's, you know, it's a way of storytelling which harkens back to The Highway Men, and in their famous song, The Highway Men, where it is a song about largely reincarnation of different people at different epochs, everything going from a highwayman, right through to I Fly a Starship, you know, across the universe. divide, I think, is the lyrics, and that is sung by Chris Christopherson, who's a really interesting character once you learn about him. But it's this kind of like epic, almost like an epic poem, you know, like, it's this, this harkens back to an old-fashioned, a more old-fashioned way of storytelling with deep lyrics and deep meaning, really. At the end of the day, the song is really about how life and everything that you become are waste away and it's like, there's nothing left, right? Even if you're king or ruler, you die the same way as everybody else. So those were the lyrics of the song of her racing along a beach. where the realms out, and it kind of fits, I would say, to be fair, in a small clip moment. But if you look at it deeper, it's kind of quite interesting, isn't it? Because Trump and his family are part of an empire. Just the same, you know, same power, you know, same epic power profile as any emperor of old, right? Whether it's Caesar, whether it's whoever. and this is the daughter of the emperor, and that's the song that they choose. One more time, because the world that we live in loves these types of ironic moments like this. and, you know, about the fall of emperors and leaders. No, I don't think St. Peter will call his name. I remember Donald Trump was on a plane, he said, I'll never get into heaven. I think he's correct about that. But I don't think heaven is exactly what he thinks it is. He probably thinks it's full of cash. Let's keep on going here. So a lot of people are noticing there is a phenomenon here with a lot of people now criticizing the lone juror, saying the lone juror in the Lindsay Clancy case is responsible for, you know, a great injustice. in the world because they did not find Lindsay Clancy not guilty and that was the obvious thing and they don't like this juror because they held out and they decided no they think they weren't convinced that beyond a reasonable doubt Lindsay Clancy or they weren't convinced that there was you know a chance I guess that Lindsay Glancy, a reasonable chance that Lindsay Clancy, there was, you know, was insane. Now, there have been lawyers that have spoken on this, talking about the pre-planning and regarding Lindsay Clancy, you know, and getting the husband to go away so she could murder the children is evidence of non-psychosis because in a psychosis you're not rational. You don't plan. There's no evidence that she had a prior history of psychosis either. There's no evidence that she had any history of postpartum depression either. I mean things that can be documented. You can always make the argument that she probably did. Maybe she did. But there's no evidence that she did. That's the difference. There's no diagnoses. whatever the case is. Now, she, Lindsay Clancy, admits that she killed the children. She admits that. She admits that she actually killed the children. She says she heard voices, which is her claim. Now, so that is basically... The summary, now here is how the women here in regarding the supporters of Lindsay Clancy see that one juror that would not basically stand down, right? They would not bend to the will of the rest, which is the job of, you're supposed to go with what you think. If you do not think that, then you shouldn't be swayed by the masses. It is a mistrial, so we'll see if the circus continues. But let's take a look here. Anyway, Chris Martinson said, whoa, this is quite the, I…