FlyDubai plane attack oddities by @theouterlight on 3Speak
FlyDubai plane attack oddities --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #news
Hi, this is Ed, back again with another video. Shout out to everybody on Patreon and Subscribe Star, thank you for your support. And of course, shout out to everyone on the Hive blockchain as well as Substack. So I'm going to talk about the Fly Dubai flight to Israel. which is over the legacy media. But I think something, whether you believe it or not, you probably know my opinion on it, which I'll tell you throughout this video, the problem is whether this is organic. or whether this is non-organic, the outcome used to be in the old world, you know, like 20 years ago, 10 years ago, even five years ago, would be that this would be a boom in terms of propaganda, right? You would be able to lobby off the propaganda over this. You'd be able to point to this exact thing and say, well, we need legislation changed or whatever, and this still might be effective in the political circuit. But in general, that is massively reduced. Why? Because you have an entity that comes out of this, whether organic or not organic, nearly everyone either doesn't pay attention to it at all because they don't care, or the only other people that are really sharing it like mad are people that are debunking it. whether you believe it or not, there is large volumes of people and that's where a lot of the traffic goes. You know, it's people talking about the glass of water that didn't fall over even though it nosedived. Obviously, there's a temporal situation there, whether that glass of water was placed. after the incident or beforehand. But it doesn't matter, that's what's being shared. So what you do is, if this is non-organic, what you do is you're actually creating a type of black propaganda, because the only people are paying attention to it in large volumes, in a significant way, are the people that don't believe it. And those are the people that are sharing it. what the outcome of it is you have this old model that just doesn't really get its teeth into humanity like it used to. Do you believe it or not? I mean, Ripley's believe it or not, that is your own, you know, entitled to your own opinion, but I do have a video here as this is more of a lighthearted look at it, and this is by Forbidden HQ, and after this we'll go into some of the details, but this is, you know, a humorous take on it, satire, and this is what's being shared, right? You know, there has hundreds of thousands of views and only three hours, all kinds of people making memes and videos of it. So let's take a look at the flight here, or at least what really happened, apparently. You were born to fly, I was born to make it. In the cockpit? A sword! This is for my supreme leader! Not, something is blocked. This is for my supreme leader! Not today. I know that sound. Chosen Pipes, emergency call. Emergency call. Pressure, flow, balance. Problem solved. Cut! Bravo! I love a good sire! Wow! In regarding this, of course, the narrative, well, the people that were on board were, apparently, you know, there was two trained assault teams, two extra pilots, a cardiac surgeon and a psychologist and three nurses as part of the passengers. Maybe that's... Maybe that's normal, but apparently according to Gork, the statistical probability of that, which this isn't really a statistical probability because you're throwing in these particular factors, right? Which is creating this like really crazy probability of that actually happening. Yeah, it's just a random chess piece arrangement, really. But there was a plumber there who, you know, apparently took control of it. Obviously, there were pilots there, they said, they could come in there. And they got past the door. And one of the main questions for me is, how did they get into the cabin door? Well, the narrative is, the person that was being attacked, they actually opened the door for the other passages, right? That's the narrative, right? So here's some of the things people say, like, just go through some just overview in a moment. This isn't going to be as long as normal, by the way, this video. People putting this cockpit door there, you know, just making it out of wood so they can bust through. Obviously, post 9-11, the cockpit doors are heavily reinforced to stop people from ever being able to get into the cockpit. Say, whatever happened, they say this was opened by a person. Do you believe it? Now, the plane itself had a problem with its rudder when it landed. If these images are even genuine, okay, that's where I am, if these images are genuine. But apparently, according to the mainstream use, it lost its rudder, so how did it gain control of itself? The rudder is a very important part of the plane in order to make it fly. and they were just saying that without this rudder, this is what people are saying, that it would be very difficult to even gain control of the plane. Of course, I don't have a background in aeronautics, so I can't tell you whether that's true. But here is, now this is a flight, although it's not named in there. This is a flight from, regarding other flights that have large turbulence, including Singapore. You can see the difference between that flight and this flight here, right? So here are some of the photos, as you can see this Singaporean Airlines, I believe this one is. I can see mass turbulence or stuff like this, and you just have chaos. you know, everything falling down, you know, oxygen masks falling, so on and so forth. And you just had a pretty clean area for the Dubai flight, right? It was a pretty clean area. And like I always said, why are all these screens turned off? Another person picked up on this, and you'll hear them talk about it a bit later in a video. But this is what stood out to me. Why are those screens turned off? The only place you can turn off those screens, and this is a photograph of the Dubai Flight to Israel, from their video of them storming the cockpit. is the fact is that these LCD screens on the back of the seats are all turned off. Now, the only place you can do that is the cockpit. So why would the pilots turn this off in the midst, because you would assume that they wouldn't turn it off before for some random reason. That's the only person that could turn off all these screens in a row, right, for whatever unknown reason they want to just turn them off, switch off the power. The only person they could do that is from the cockpit, So why would they do that in the midst of being attacked, and this person, the co-pilot stabbing the other pilot, or the pilot, why would they, why would one of them turn off all the screens to the, you know, the entertainment systems there, or the information systems? They also have movies, of course, and information, flight paths, weather, you know, all types of stuff are on the back there, and all of them are turned off. you know, here is Majority Taylor Green. And you also had Craig Murray, who was a former ambassador for England, and I can't remember where he was ambassador for. I think it might have been actually somewhere in the Middle East, but I can't remember. But he came out and he was saying, well, it's really strange that that glass of water is still there. I wish I had that... I forgot that particular clip, but you've probably all seen it. This is just a little thing where the person's standing there, and there's this, I think it might be on one of these videos coming up. But Majorie Taylor Green saying, I thought oxygen masks came out when planes suddenly nose dive, nose dived 14,000 feet. You have to excuse me, I only got one hour of sleep. And that wasn't because I couldn't get to sleep, it's just that I got stuck doing something, okay? I'm a bit off today. Turbulience. I can't even pronounce that word at the moment. But you see all of the oxygen masks there, and just a picture of them, that didn't happen in the Dubai footage, right? Or at least the footage on that plane. It never happened at all. You don't see oxygen masks fall down. Why is that? Now it doesn't mean they're going to fly all the time, but here is the reasoning why they would fall in this. If you have a sudden nose dive and you have a massive change in G-force, that is people fly up into the ceiling, and this is not uncommon for these particular situations, because that's why they have you wear a seatbelt. Because if you're not wearing a seatbelt and the plane itself changes drastically. you know, it's orientation or whatever, you go up in the air, right? You're like a bunch of oranges inside a truck, and, you know, a truck hits something, the oranges go everywhere. And that's what happens, you go flying up in the top there and get hit. Now, as you can see there by that picture, that's why I have your seatbelt. Now, when you hit something, and there's a sudden shock, the oxygen masks, and I want to come down, or whatever the case is, also, changes and stuff, but especially, you know, really rough, you know, rough damage, you would say, to the plane or indicators for the plane that there is damage, you know, sensors or whatever that are picking up stuff, will drop these particular oxygen masks, but you don't have that happen on this plane, right? Let's get some different pitches here of the inside. Well, here you are of the inside, you just don't happen. This is when they're storming the cabin because there's a sudden change where the plane's nose diving according to the narrative. Do you think that they would be able to walk to the front of the plane while it's nose diving like this, or do you think they'd be thrown around like an orange or whatever in the back of some fruit basket when you're... when you're in your car and you slam into a pole or something. Of course, you know, you'd go everywhere, you'd be on the sky, you'll be hitting stuff. Now, in the Singaporean airline flight, there was something like a hundred and something people injured when this particular event happened. Where is it here? So here you have, this is the aftermath and photos of the plane and Singapore Airlines Flight SQ 321 or maybe... may 21, 2024, which suffered turbulence, I don't know, and dropped 178 feet in about 54 meters and 4.6 seconds. So Air Canada, Boeing 787 experienced the same thing at 36,000 feet. This is how it looked, and you can see both photos there. So in the Singaporean Airlines event, I believe it was like 180, 100 something people were injured. Whereas in the Dubai flight, I don't believe it was hardly anybody that was injured. In fact, there was a little girl who states their narrative is they were in the bathroom at the time in the toilet. Okay, and when they came out, it was you know, it was all over. Well, I mean, if you're walking around trying to go to the toilet, when a plane drops from, you know, drops to, you know, drops thousands of feet, right, then you are going to be thrown around, right? So, that is the narrative. So everyone was questioning this, for instance, you know, Assam Yusuf. uh the cardiac surgeon happens to be a vegan by the way in plant based but he was questioning it everyone was questioning this how did a normal guy save the whole plane from crashing it course he does it through a window of satire is very good at that here's wild horse a popular count on x what type of plane was it and they outline the plane If a typical Boeing, you know, max aid is in a nose dive, let's say 650 to 700 miles per hour, and I ran into the cockpit and yank back the control stick without doing anything else, what would likely happen? Gork says that those speeds, etc., the airframe would almost certainly suffer catastrophic structural failure, wings, fuselage and tail, separating before any control recovery. Yeah, I mean, these are just like, you know, gawk answering stuff. It doesn't mean it's true, but, you know, here you have this plane fell from 34 ,000 feet. This is the Dubai flight to 17,000 feet in two minutes. I heard it was 40 seconds, but whatever, two minutes, yet passengers were walking in a straight line, unhinged, no oxygen masks were deployed. So just walking around in the video. that doesn't make sense to me, and that is a huge indicator of something that just doesn't fit the narrative. How are they walking around with their cell phones when they claim at this specific time at foul thousands of feet? Now, if this was non-organic, later on, you can have any flight data you want, right? Maybe they're tracking the plane on flight radar or something, so maybe you'd have to couch it around something like that, you know? But largely, you can make up stuff. So I wouldn't expect, I would expect a change in narrative regarding that, unless this is all how it actually went down. So here is the actual glass of water. I thought I didn't have it. Here was one man, this has been shared, saying that this plastic cup of water is, you know, sitting there, and nothing's happening. people have been quote unquote debunking this by stating, no, you see it has a lid on it, or maybe the water came at a different time, you have to, you know, maybe it came after the event, which is fair enough. But here is the point. Throughout these types of things, in the, you know, at the event when it's happening like this, you would expect if there was water trays or things with water to be all over the place anyway. I mean, this might not be an indicator of itself of anything particularly happening because you could say the argument it came later, but there should be trash everywhere. That's the point. Things falling down, people damaged, you know, the head's bleeding, you know, they should be all over the place. The plane has gone through a significant change in altitude very suddenly. Like I heard, it was like 40 seconds, but in that other one it says it's two minutes. So, here is something which people are passing around and they're pointing at the shoes, saying the shoes are a different color. of this person here, but how I understand that, how I understand this is people are also saying that this is a different individual, okay, that their here is different, their structure is different and it's a different individual. It might well be a different individual. None of this really makes sense to me. The fact is, is that this individual sat in these clothes without a spare change of clothes or shoes for eight hours for him to meet Benjamin Netanyahu, as you can see here in this particular video. So he's explaining what happened to him, and he's got... I won't go into it, but he's got like blood on him still, he's been sitting around. So you're saying at an airport, they would not give him a change of clothes. Remember, blood itself, just blood in general, is a vector for infection, is a vector in to spread disease? Well, maybe they had hepatitis. see maybe they had certain types of things so you would expect just general safety protocol or medical protocol to get him out of those clothes of his meeting and interacting with other people but I don't know of course it could be different but he's sitting in those clothes for apparently eight hours in order to meet Benjamin Netanyahu and he's in his bloody clothes and he's showing to Netanyahu his bloody feet for instance his I guess he walked around in a socks as the narrative before he put on his shoes, but his socks are all bloody for one reason. By the way, just in general... People have been saying, not saying I agree with it, but they're saying this doesn't look like real blood. Real blood is actually surprisingly difficult to actually get right. You can see this when you see films, right? Films seem to always have an endless problem in getting the exact shade of blood right. Now, to be fair, under, you know... the director of photography and lighting does play a huge effect in concert with the special effects in this regard in order to get the blood to show up correctly under the certain lighting schemes they have. The lighting scheme and the way they light is slightly off, the blood's going to look completely different. So it is a complicated dance, but nonetheless, does that look like real blood to you? I don't know, maybe we'd have to have like a trauma surgeon chime in and ask, and has the photograph been manipulated in some way in terms of the contrast? Maybe it's possible. So here is one problem I find, and this is, here's a video, this is from NBC News, and this is talking about this lady here who's also in this video, Sky News speaks to fly Dubai passenger after pilot a stab. Let's take a look at this one here and pay attention to the screens. So that, of course, is after it's over. But here's a strange one. Why would you pick up your camera? So the camera, saying the phone is on the ground recording the ceiling, and she's going to pick it up. Kind of strange, if you ask me. And look how she's picking it up. Look at the amount, look at the width in her hands and how she's picking up. It looks like she's picking up an actual... larger camera, right? Right there. Is that a phone? Do you pick up a phone like that? I mean, the width of her hands seems, of course, this could be dependent upon lenses, it could depend upon all kinds of things. I mean, I don't know, maybe she's just not using a camera, maybe she's using a stills camera. But if it's a stills camera, such as, you know, like, you know, well, whatever, you know, trying to explain it to people that aren't familiar with cameras, of course, I'm not a huge camera person either, but... you know, one of those classic ones, digital ones that you see, you'd see people on National Geographic have with the big lenses, you know, a proper camera or people prepararazzi. But then why has it been recorded in portrait? Again, all these kinds of things. Not only that, but portrait that's corrected. Of course, you could correct this after the fact. But here, if we go back to the screams themselves, So, now you would be, if you had a plane fuselage, and you go to the plane and you record audio of people screaming, and then you compare it to, like, other audio, I don't know, but it's just a hunch, in my opinion, that that audio seems really flat, and it doesn't sound like... stuff that you would hear in a plane, like an enclosed space. Obviously, planes are designed also to absorb noise, so that could change things. There's many dynamics here, but it does really sound strange to me that screaming. It kind of seems like, I don't know this for sure, but it kind of seems like it's added in. Is that true? Is that what happens? Obviously, I have no way to tell. I mean, you need to spend, like, thousands of dollars probably to figure that out, or you would need to have that knowledge translated. You need to be, like, an audio engineer or something. I can, you know, go compare it to, and they do have sounds recorded everywhere, you know. Audio engineers know about this. I don't mean an audio engineer, I mean like, you know, a Foley artist or something like that. Someone that has like a really high level understanding of sounds in different places. So that's what you would basically have to have. I can't remember what this is. The plane is flying wrong for two hours. Okay, so this is a CNN clip where the pilots themselves talk about how... basically the actions are impossible. But you've probably seen it, let's play it here for people that have it. So you're just kind of lulled there, staring into space, and then it drops more than 20,000 feet in 35 seconds, finally topping out at a speed, we understand, of 700 miles an hour. So she said 30-something seconds. That's what I remember, 40, 30 seconds. I do not remember two minutes. But that's even way less. Okay, so there they are saying it, but can you imagine that? Dropping thousands of feet. Let's catch that again. And you look down, and it's desert pretty much the whole way. So you're just kind of lulled there, staring into space, and then it drops more than 20,000 feet in 35 seconds, finally topping out at a speed, we understand, of…