Comparing Martha Reeves's US National Anthem to Faith Hill's by @theouterlight on 3Speak
Comparing Martha Reeves's US National Anthem to Faith Hill's --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #news
Hi, this is Ed back again with another video. Shout out to everybody on Patreon and Subscribe Star that make this possible. I have solved the problem here. By the way, this is the name of a new channel called Clown World News Fellowship. Why is there a new channel? Well, this channel you're listening to, I have yet to name to Your Sincerely Clown World. But the other channel is so named because as it happened, serendipity, so to speak. I was working on a problem, which has been happening for some time. What is that problem? Well, first, this was, this was, this was a post that was made on my channel where somebody was, um, stating that I go on and on, uh, you know, go on and on and on and in different directions, and my videos are far too long, and I go into rants about things that are completely unrelated to the topic. Fair enough, I value feedback, and as a matter of fact, I was thinking about this myself and have been for a number of years. You can read more on screen as to what they say. So, basically, I say I go on like endless diatripes, which is true. You know, I might be talking about a topic and then start talking about where I grew up or a milk factory or something, or whatever the case is. Now, what is the issue is that when I say that I'm going to do very short things, people say they don't like it. They like these long rambling videos because some people put them on for ambiance in the background, as I do myself. So here we have the issue. Are the videos going to be short on point, or are they going to be long? Because you can't. you can't have one video that does both, unless you create a script, an AI script as I did, or at least a workflow system, because I just learned that Google actually has an API that lets you up play these videos. Now, I'm pretty, pretty dense, it's probably been around for a while. But having an API means I can write a script, well, can create a script, and open code, for example, that can take the long form video that's an hour and a half, two hours. And what it can do is they can get a transcript via an API, take that transcript and then edit down to the second from that transcript down into smaller videos, also removing blank space, uh, rants in between videos that go off topic and all these kinds of things. So I built this little workflow architecture of things that I wanted. And now I drop the video in, and it'll give me like four videos or five videos at about 8 to 10 minutes that will be on topic. Even if I go on a rant in the middle of that topic, it'll edit it out, and then that will be uploaded to the Clown World News Fellowship another channel. Here you have another channel on YouTube and I tested this workflow, I threw in a video and edited down and followed all these particular steps, then uploaded it itself, gave titles to the video which were derived from the actual transcript itself, and there you have a finished product, although unlisted on the other channel called the Clown News Fellowship. And all those videos happen to be shorter videos, as you can see these here are five minutes each. Now I have, I'm going for the range about 8 to 10 minutes, I think that's fair for a topic, if obviously I go on for, because I could be going on for 20 minutes, it could easily be reduced to that. So, so about, you know, like 8 to 10 minutes will be the videos going forward. They go on unlisted, I check them to make sure, though there's not much I have to check, because it's me talking, so I know what's in it. and then it'll just upload it these videos will be scheduled so because there's a day break in between when I upload these videos will be scheduled to take place on that day six will be uploaded on that day and then over the second the following day maybe with you know three hours in between just to give some space so people's feeds aren't just spammed with videos you can watch them over there if you want if you want the long short form content and there you go problem solved in regarding that, what does this do? Well, it adjusts audio levels. So if the audio is too loud and I'm like this and it's peeking out, it will bring it back down to something like this. It has the ability in order to see the audio levels, which, you know, put into the workflow there, so it's going to adjust the audio level so they're all going to be either brought up higher if the mic's too low or brought down lower, and that will have a continuous audio throughout those particular videos. I will be selecting from the list of topics that I've talked about and decide which I want it to actually upload because it'll be cutting more than is needed. As I said, all videos around 8 to 10 minutes. Yes, there are spelling mistakes in here. Well, there might be some editing things. I just type this out. Six videos cut from a larger video. So those are the kinds of things that will be doing. So you go over there, you can see the videos. They're all short videos. Just pick what you want to see. of the topics that are interested in for you. And that's it, really. I don't have much of say, but I think that is, you know, they say, you know, they say it's kind of like two birds, one stone, right? Got the longer form videos on this channel, which will be at some stage renamed to Your Sincerely Clown World, and you've got that shorter stuff over on the other channel. So if you don't like the long form content, just unsubscribe from this one. go over to the other one and subscribe over there, right? Or if, you know, if you just want that short form content, or you can subscribe to both, obviously, that is up to you, but that is half the problem I want to talk about. The other one is, what about people that say, hey, you're on YouTube, YouTube's full of censorship. They are correct, they are correct, but most of my audience is on YouTube. But what I have done is because with my other channel, I've got to turn down there. the mic volume sorry it's speaking out let's try it about there that looks a bit better um so I made an Odyssey account which is synced to this new YouTube account. I couldn't do that before. It was synced for a time at the Outer Light, but I couldn't do this before because I was run into some kind of era problem where I tried to sync another channel and it kind of like done something and glitched out. So now it would not sink any videos from the Outer Light and it would not sink any videos from this channel, the Daily Rabbit Hole. okay, it just wouldn't do it. You try to sync it or say, this account is already signed up to what, I go, what are you talking about, but it doesn't sync. It just doesn't work, okay? And so, the thing is, now it should work. Now it should sink from the new channel I created, which is going to have three or four videos on it a day, or, you know, basically there'd be a video there every day. And what's that, what that is going to do is going to sync over to Odyssey. So for everybody talking about, you know, they want alternative platforms, they don't want it watch on YouTube, and that is for people listening on Rumble, or even three speak, okay? You can just go over to Odyssey and you can see those videos, right? And I'm not going to sync to any other channels because upload, because this is all automated, if I was doing this myself, this would take me hours. I don't have hours to spend taking six videos and uploading them to every platform, right? It's just, it's not, it's not, it's not, it's not, it would be detrimental to my life, okay? I have other things to do than just upload endlessly for four hours to all these kinds of different platforms and constantly have to figure out, you know, errors or whatever the case is. So it would just be honestly with that particular channel. If you watch on Rumble and you... you know, then you can jump over to Odyssey and check those out too. You can subscribe to two places. That's what I do with a lot of different channels, right? So you can subscribe to multiple different channels. You can watch long-form content on a three-speak or the hive blockchain, or you can watch that shorter stuff on Odyssey if you want. Excuse me, that really is up to you. Now, let's get into our first topic here in regarding news stories, because, yes, that was a bit of a wonder. But let's get into our first topic in regarding news stories. By the way, actually, before I get into that first news topic, I just want to say overall, this particular video might be a bit of scatterbrained in all kinds of directions, and that's just because I have just finished doing all that workflow stuff in order to optimize, you know, and get that everything working the way I hope it works, and just uploading those videos to the other channel. Which will include, like, topics I find interesting that are not related to the news. It's not going to be clogged with news. It's going to be all kinds of stuff, right? But there's going to be news stories in there. So let's get to our first story here. Our first story is actually the US National Anthem. Now, people were talking about the particular national anthem that was sung at the Women's Pro Baseball League, and they're saying, you know, it was really bad. Now this particular anthem is sung by, you know, a professional singer, but she is older, she's 85 years old now, so her voice doesn't always stay intact. There are some 85-year-old still killing it, but she's not one of them. She might have some vocal problems on the day, I don't know what it was. This is Martha Reeves, who was a Motown singer, and she was with Martha and the Vandallas. They signed to Motown in the 60s. The most famous one is Dancing in the Street, 1964, which was covered by Mick Jagger and David Bowie, and a bunch of other stuff you can look up. But here is her singing, the actual national anthem, which a lot of people thought was maybe the worst that they had ever seen. Let's take a look here. blest, gleaming, whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous hive, all the rappers we watched were so gallantly streaming. Okay, so you can see the singing is not particularly that good in this version of the US National Anthem. at the pro-women's, what I read was the first professional women's baseball game, but I don't think that's true, is it? I mean, hasn't there been professional baseball in the United States for a long time? Nonetheless, I don't think the other women actually are very good at singing either, but here's the puzzle in it. The puzzle is they rehearse these things. So if this was something happening on the day, and it sounds, doesn't sound like she's just got a little something wrong with her voice, like on the day, maybe she had a cold or something. It sounds like it's, you know, she doesn't have that gift anymore, right? It's something that is faded. But the thing about it is they rehearse these things, so they must have known. that she had a problem with her voice. So why didn't they exchange her out? Because putting her up there when she has a problem with her voice isn't exactly a kind thing to do, is it? She's literally known as the singer, and you know that she has this problem, and you put her in front of the microphone to sing, and largely probably embarrass her, not in front of America, but the entire world. Why did they do that? It's almost like a humiliation ritual, right? By design, whereby... it's kind of a humiliation of the national anthem in the United States. For instance, this national anthem, if you're just looking at it symbolically, seems frail, broken. It doesn't have any power to it, right? It doesn't inspire anyone. I don't think this would inspire many people. And that there's actually a beautiful story to the national anthem of the United States, if anybody wants to look into it. regarding its architecture and what the words mean. But this is really a, you would call it classically, a frail performance by a woman who's 85 years old. I mean, she seems in good condition to 85, but her voice is definitely deteriorated. Let's listen to it a little bit more, and then I'll show you a contrast. In air, gave proof to the night that our flag was still there. Still there. So you can see the look of the baseball players there, right? Which this is a professional women's league, it says. But anyway, the woman's pro baseball league. I don't know much about it. Maybe this league is different than just women's baseball, but women's baseball obviously has been around forever. But why would you put her up there to sing like that? You wouldn't know what her singing was like in her rehearsals, right? You would know that. So why do it? And everybody can tell she's off-key. Everything in there is off-key. I'm not like a, you know, I don't know a lot about singing, okay, but I would suspect there's many listening to this probably have a fair idea. You have to get old read wonder to a... to investigate, right? He's obviously a good, great musician. But the thing is, is these things that City of Angels, which I used to have as the outro, we're still due from time to time. It's just that I got rid of most outros just for speed, because I'd have to sit there on my particular setup and listen to the go away and then come back to turn it off, because, you know, I run a really low-key operation here, but beautiful songs, City of Angels. So, you listen to that, and clearly everything seems to be off-key. So here is one of the most famous US national anthems, for contrast, if you're from overseas, you probably haven't heard this, and if you're in the United States, maybe you've heard it, maybe you haven't. This is from 2000, and this is largely regarded as one of the greatest. national anthems at a game ever, this was a football game, and the singer is Faith Hill. But this is from 2000, so this was 26 years ago, right? And it's incredible the difference in power, right? And the difference when you're listening to it, like, you know, you listen to this, and it's kind of probably, it's very inspiring to the crowd, very, you know, like a patriotic, patriotic. national anthem for the people listening there, the Americans, and you compare it to the other one, and as I said, the other one seems like a humiliation, or I should say, a demoralization. Like, everything has to be demoralized. It's like, you know, everything has to be broken down. Every movie hero has to be turned into something you dislike or hate. Every, your Superman has to turn into something you do not like. It's demoralization, right? All your movies have to be shades of endless gray. Like, you should, someone should send Christopher Knoll in like a different colour palette that isn't black, grey and white. People love his movies, but... That's what I like about Wizard of Oz anyway. It's colorful. Let's take a listen here at one of the famous national anthems of all time. Signed for the Hearing Impaired by Atlanta's Briar Lake Signing Choir. and will be sung by award-winning recording artist Faith Hill. Super Bowl 34 approaching the points off from the Georgia Dome in Atlanta when we come back. Yeah, really, I mean, that's a powerful remission, right? It's like respecting the national anthem. It's singing it properly. It's thinking about it in terms of being a master of her craft, Faith Hill, being a singer. It's like thinking about it. in ways in order to elevate it and then hit that high note, right? So why is it the world, or at least in the United States, you have this here, and this is in front of the world, I should say, this is viral, people wondering what exactly is going on here, like... Look, a lot of things can make saying go viral, but there could be a push behind it, there could be anything, but it really is demoralization, in my opinion. Now listen to. Look at the faces of everyone. They all realize that this is not going very well. And also, as I said, it's sad for the singer. She is a famous singer. She looks like well-known. Obviously, I don't know everything about music, so I hadn't actually heard of her before. I've heard of dancing in the street, obviously, by Bowie and Jagger. But why put her up there like that? You know in rehearsal... Is there a musician out there? Maybe somebody can say, hey, that can happen to your voice on the day? If it happens to her voice on the day, you sub her out for someone else. You don't put her up there. If she literally can't sing, what do you do? You take the other two women beside her. They know the words. They've obviously been rehearsing it. You guys go, right? Because, you know, this person, this lady's voice, Martha isn't doing too well today. No, they put her up. So logically, you have to think, well, why would they do that? And then the other one is, if the rehearsal was the days before, and they reloiser voices like that, why didn't they go get somebody else? Because they want it to be like this. But so proudly we hail at the twilight's last gleaming, whose broad stripes and brights are. It's also completely out of sequence, right? Like, they're singing at these words, and she's singing, like, at one point she forgets the words. Look, it's not her fault if she's not doing too good, and she is 85. So, 85 is the new, like, 60, though. Look at Fauci running up and down those steps. So, anyway, that is that story. So, if all goes well, the AI... and clip that story, which this should pick up in the transcript, clip that particular story, and put that out there. So we'll see what happens. I did test it. It does work, so here's another one. This is from Liz Gunn, this is Barry Young. If you want an update on Barry Young, which was the New Zealand whistleblower, who took that data, he scrubbed it, so it didn't have any personal data in it, from the health department here. And then what he did is he released it so other people could look at it. and they charged him with this, and we were going to hear what the judge had to say. The judge stated that they have basically all the materials they need, and they'll come back at a later verdict. And this is to do whether they're going to put them in prison for sharing the data, right? That was anonymized, so you couldn't tell who the people were. It was just numbers. And why do they even collect the data if no researchers or nobody can ever have a look at it? In fact... the health department wouldn't even supply the data to the judge. Now I understand it, okay? When the lawyer or the teams were asking to have a look at the data, they wouldn't provide it. It's like it's classified, right? It's classified now. You know, New Zealanders should obviously see the data. right, this is all just a scheme anyway. If you ask me, like, the data should obviously be provided to researchers, anybody who requests it, so they can crunch those statistics. I mean, you're always clear of a, you know, you're always clear, you're always the person of good deeds, isn't it? If no one can actually audit the deeds you've actually done. The person of good deeds, see, the AI will cut all of that out. And the AI can start here with the story. So this is the other story, which is Liz Gunn. Barry Young is the whistleblower that came out, and you can read some more on screen. I want to play in his own words. It goes for about three minutes. So this is very interesting. It starts towards the end. I'll just play the end part of this. Then we'll talk a little bit about it. Actually, let's just play the whole thing for Barry. who I think is a brave individual and done the right thing. There was something the other day, actually, I won't go into a rant, but there was something the other day, I can't, actually, I've forgotten what it was, but Tucker Carson said something really interesting. No, it was, it was a person on the interesting books channel. See how easy it is? To Rome, it was, it was, this was a thing, it was on, Can't remember the exact name of the channel, but I'm subscribed to his interesting…