Dr. Judy Wood on Joyce Riley Power Hour radio show (March 23, 2010) by @mestruth on 3Speak
- Source: - Telegram: - MES Links: --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #911truth #conspiracy #drjudywood #hurricane #technology #weather #climate #dew #deepdives
Ladies and gentlemen, sorry about that. We had a giant crash of something, which I don't know what it was, but we're back now. Anyway, let me go to the subject of talking about what happened with the judge who ordered a release of Guantanamo detainee. Sorry, you didn't all hear it. I'm going to repeat this. If you did hear it once, well, it's worth repeating. A judge ordered the release of a Guantanamo Bay detainee. described in the 9-11 Commission report as a significant L-CIA operative who provided advice to three of the September 11th hijackers. The ruling in favor of the detainee, his last name is Mohamed Salahi, same name as the people who snuck into the White House. What a coincidence, was disclosed Monday in a two-sentence court entry. Two sentences, that's it. I think what has happened here is the judge, U.S. District Judge James Robertson, issued a written decision saying, this man's going to be released, there is no evidence to hold him. No evidence to hold him. He supposedly gave directions to three people as to how to find Afghanistan. I can't believe this story. I really can't. But that's what they're saying, that he gave three people direction on how to find Afghanistan, and so that right there tells you. that because it was Mohamed Ada, Ziazara, Marwan al-Shehi, and Ramsey bin al-Shib, four people, excuse me, that helped coordinate 9-11, that he is guilty. Well, this doesn't make any sense. There was a lieutenant colonel Stuart Couch, who was a former military prosecutor who basically refused to prosecute this man, refused. and he had to go to another job, they dropped the prosecution, and now the judge says, I'm going to order him released. I don't know what's going to happen, I don't know what they're going to do to him, but I'm telling you, the 9-11 theory, the government's conspiracy theory, is falling apart. No one is being, I mean, you would think in the greatest criminal trial of the world, we would be watching it on crime TV or something, but we're not, we're not seeing it, we're not hearing anything about it. They're just kind of gradually saying, and by the way, there's a two-sentence statement to release this guy. I'll tell you why later on. That's what James Robertson said. I'll issue a written statement later on telling you why I'm letting this man go. This is huge. This is absolutely huge. Well, we're going to be talking in the next hour to our guest who's going to help us understand what in the world is going on. Maybe she'll have some feelings about this, I don't know, but we're going to talk to Dr. Judy Wood in the next hour, and then Andrew Johnson in the hour after that. So stay tuned to the power hour with that in mind. We want to get to the bottom of what happened. Now, remember, she says thermite was not used in the building. You know what? The building didn't happen. the way they said it happened, that's really all we need to know, but she is a real big promoter of having factual evidence, and we need to find out what she has to say. So anyway, back to that story, Guantanamo, they were going to release the guy. They have no evidence, duh. John, do we have any callers? Do we have any call? Helen in Oklahoma, Helen, you're on the air. Go ahead, please. Good morning. I have a new use for bowel green clean. Oh, good. I had seen an ant on the floor now and then when I would go to the bathroom. Wondered where they were coming from. One day, Kenneth went in there. They were all over the window sill around on the wood. terribly, and he could only find one thing, and he grabbed the sprayer and sprayed them. Whoa. It was where I had a mixture of bio-green clean, half and half. Awesome. Hey, stay right there. I'm just down the line because I want to talk to you during the break. Stay there, Helen. We'll be right back. I tried to get a hold of you this past weekend, even. So I'll talk to your... I'd have to this break. Welcome back to the Power Hour, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us. I want to tell you the action item. We didn't talk about the action item earlier, and I didn't talk about it yesterday. and I thank some of you for reminding me, and the action item is, this time we're going to read one proverb every day, one proverb every day. That is because the proverbs, there's 31 of them, and that way we have one for every day of the month. Today's, the 23rd, is amazing. When you sit down to eat with a ruler, look what is before you. Put a knife to your throat if a man is given to appetite. Do not desire his delicacies, for that food is deceptive. Do not labor to be rich. Cease from your own understanding. And it says, do not eat the bread of one having an evil eye, nor desire his delicacies, for he reckons in his life, so is, for as he reckons in his life, So is he. Eat and drink, he says to you, but his heart is not with you. Do not speak. It's really amazing. It talks about don't be a gluttonous person with meat. I just find this so amazing, talking about discipline. So I wanted to share that with you. That just happens to be today's. So don't overeat meat. And what it basically is talking about is, you know, the rulers who have all the food at their disposal, we'll try to give you junk food. Isn't that true? They try to impress you with all the fancy desserts and all, but don't be given to the gluttonous eating of the kings and of the elite. That's what it's all about. So what we have to do is we have to find out what is food for us, and what is food is anything like Joshua's saying that doesn't have a label on it, doesn't have any kind of, you know, listing of the ingredients. That's what real food is. We're going to change the subject now to talk to Dr. Judy Wood. She is a Ph.D. She is a former professor of mechanical engineering and research, and her interest are in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. All things I know nothing about, absolutely nothing about. She has a BS. degree that in civil engineering, in structural engineering that she got in 1981, a master's in engineering mechanics, applied physics, and a PhD in materials engineering science that she received from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University of Blacksburg, Virginia. Now, I bring her on because her interest is 9-11, she had a real awakening. She calls it a Hiroshima. not a Pearl Harbor. She's been very well known for speaking out, and she's also come under fire by a lot of people for her beliefs. She does not believe that thermite was the cause of the building collapse. So we're going to talk to her about what her beliefs are and how she supports that. We want to get to the bottom of what the evidence is. That's all we care about is what is the evidence, and I believe that is the same as Dr. Judy Wood. Thank you, Dr. Wood, for joining us in the Power Hour today. Hello, thank you for having me. Well, let's talk about you have come under all kinds of fire by all kinds of people for your sort of, I don't know, deviating from the position that most of the 9-11 people are taking. First of all, what is the conventional theory that most people go by, and then how do you deviate from that? Well, I don't look at what other people look at. what other people believe in. I just look at the evidence. Okay. And, you know, if I have a theory, my theory is, let's go look at the evidence. Let's see what the evidence tells us, because I believe that if you, if you talk about beliefs, I believe that if you listen to the evidence carefully enough, it will tell you exactly what happened. If you don't know what happened, keep listening to the evidence until you do. All right, I can agree with that. I think anybody can agree with that. But I think what we have now is a dispute over what the evidence is, because David Ray Griffin and a number of people are making their statements about what happened. You, on the other hand, sort of have a different position. Let's talk about what the position is of Dr. Judy Wood. Well, you know, for the record, I don't believe that our government is responsible. for executing the events of 9-11, nor do I believe our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9-11. This isn't a case of belief. This is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined, who did it, it must be determined what was done and how it was done. And any crime investigation needs to go in that order. So let's look at what happened. That's what you first need to look at before you... go to the how, and the who. And so my first question is, when you look at the scene, where did the buildings go? And that is a crucial question. Reporters were asking that question on day one and on day two. Why did they stop asking that question? And why did the rest of us stop asking that question? Okay, so you say one of the major questions is, where did the buildings go? Yes, 7 o'clock in the morning of 9-11, there were two towers standing there, and then they went away. The material itself went away. Before noon, we're told all sorts of stories, but, like, it was shipped to China. But as soon as the dust cleared, before noon on 9-11. There's photos from various angles by various different photographers. Where's the debris? It's street level. And then there's people who go down below street level, and it's hollow down there. Anybody down there, there, there, there? You can hear an echo. Now, wait a minute, didn't we see all this debris that had fallen down? Didn't we picture that and watch them clean it up? First of all, they call it a pile, so you think that there's a pile. It works from the subconscious. Word choice is important. Okay. For our perceptions. That's just how we work, as humans. And so if you call it a pile, then this pile got taller with time. They trucked in dirt. That's another interesting thing. But if you just look at all of the evidence, just go there and you look. you know, set out to find the answer or to, you know, here's a choice of answers, eating, me, mighty, mo, you know, pick and shoes. No, you just go and look, you know, feel the area, taste it, smell it, you know, just experience it. So the first thing you notice is that when the dust clears, standing at the street level, you can see completely across the site, east to west. Okay. At street level. I'll grant you that, yes. All right, so what does that mean then? We're talking about a building which was pulverized, which allegedly fell down into its footprint, is what we're told. Right. With thermite charges, that was an electronic engineering feat to bring down that building in its footprint. Well, yeah, if you, if you... you know, cut up a building, like for controlled demolition, the building still needs to come down. We don't see the evidence of a building having come down. So you're saying that it wasn't just pulverized building that we see at the bottom of that? No, no, pulverized is different than, you know, like turning to dust or turning to chunks. If you go to, you know, controlled demolition in Las Vegas, what you see is, you know, they cut a building up and they slam it to the ground to break it up. they don't, the explosives are just to take it off its support so they can then drop to the ground. And the slamming onto the ground is what breaks it up. Okay. And so these cut the building into several pieces, and then as the pieces come down, they break up. And you're saying that that did not happen, according to your evidence, in the situation with the Twin Towers? Correct. Did you see entire sections of building, you know, falling and then breaking up once they hit the ground? No, I don't know that I saw really a whole lot of other than just dust in the air is all we saw. Right. How does a solid piece of material in mid-flight turn into dust? Explosives, when they, you know, break something up, you get chunks go flying. Okay. They're breaking the chunks. The chunks don't change mid-flight. They change at the source. They change, you know, when something explodes, it breaks into chunks, the chunks go flying, and then chunks land. But on 9-11, we had, you know, large sections of wall flying that never hit the ground, because looking at them, they, like, dissolved into dust, like ice cream melting. Oh, I see. You're saying it dissolved into dust in mid -air before it hit the ground, which should have then broken it apart into the dust. Right. Okay. Air doesn't cause that much resistance to pulverize a building or to dustify it. Well, are they not saying that it was explosions that separated it into pieces or into very small pieces like dust, that it pulverized it or created the dust, the explosions? But you have a solid piece that leaves the building. All right. And then turns into powder. Okay. All right. What other reasons? do you see, other than it defies the law of physics, obviously, with what you're just saying right now, help us also see other reasons that tell you that there was not thermite in the building. Because obviously the question everybody's asking is, what was it then, if it wasn't thermite or explosions that brought the building down? Again, if it's, well, thermite doesn't explode. Thermite, you know, they use it to weld railroad tracks, or the military actually uses it for a couple things. One is to burn paper. Did you see a lot of burn paper all over southern Manhattan that day? Well, yeah, it was everywhere. Unburn paper. Correct. Oh, yeah, unburned paper, yeah. Right, the military uses thermite to burn paper. Okay, I'm not an expert on thermite, know nothing about it, so I'm kind of at your... You know, you're going to have to tell us what you think happened here. We're going to be right back after this. Four minute break. Stay tuned to the Power Hour, grab something to drink, come right back. We'll be back in four minutes with the Power Hour. This is Joyce Riley. I don't know what's going on, but we seem to have been able to not be able to keep a connection here. I don't know what's going on. I understand the program's been going in and out everywhere today. It's just not holding, and for some unknown reason, we've got some interference here. So let me just go ahead with Dr. Judy Wood and see if we can go as far as we can into this discussion. And if it doesn't work, well, we're just going to have to let it go and go to her replay, because I'm not quite sure what's happening here. Anyway, we're talking to Dr. Judy Wood, who is an engineer. She has been involved in all kinds of well-applied physics issues, and so she comes to us saying that there's something wrong with... the story, the prevailing story of thermite bringing down the building. She said, number one, that where did the building go? It just sort of evaporated into dust. Not evaporated. Okay, not evaporated, but I mean, us looking at it, we would think that it sort of went into just dust then. Yes, yes. Okay? It became dust, all right? And what other reasons do you support the fact that there was something else going on in the building? Well, I don't start with what's wrong with another story. I look at, what do I see? What is the story? You know, once, in a traumatic event, in traumatic situation, humans tend to go with the herd. When you're on the street, you hear someone yell, get down the ground, get down on the ground. You do it. Immediately. You don't stop and ask why or ask questions if it's unreasonable. You just do it. You run with the herd. And once you have something in your mind, especially from such a traumatic event, you're not going to look back and rethink it because that's reliving the event. Who would want to do that? So whatever gets planted in people's minds immediately is what sticks. You know, first impression stick. Okay. But I tend to try to look at stuff with a blank slate. Let's just clear the slate, not, you know, pick at this quote theory and that. theory, let's not have a theory, let's just look at the evidence. What do we know? We know the towers aren't there anymore. There were two towers, and then they went away. And then you start looking at things more and more and more evidence, and the story comes together, is just an enormous story. If you were busy looking at thermite or looking at, you know, looking for nukes, you miss everything else. because you're looking for an answer, so you have tunnel vision for that answer. And then also, if that is on your mind, you have a bias for it. All right, now, isn't it true, though, that they're saying that there was evidence of thermite found in the building? The building turned to dust. They're powderized, whatever you call it. You know, it's a new phenomenon, so it needs a new word, so I, like, dustify. I want to see that in the dictionary. Yeah, the building was dustified. So if you sample any dust, if 100 % of everything in the building from, you know, like the 20th store up, turn to dust, if you find dust from that building, you're going to find all sorts of things in that dust. You're going to find traces of chocolate, traces of sugar, and traces of nano wheat, you know, flour. And does that mean that chocolate chip cookies were involved? You know, the building was made out of, it was a steel frame building with aluminum cladding. So if you, if you dustify steel, it instantly rust, so you have rust. And if the building had aluminum cladding on it that was turned to dust, you have aluminum powder. Aluminum powder and an iron oxide is what thermite is. All right, so. So you have those ingredients, those are, that's what the building's made out of. Okay, the components of thermite were found in the building then, so you're saying that the, because components of thermite were found does not necessitate that thermite was found. Exactly. All right, okay, and your other. If you have, if you have a dust baggie with a zillion things that were in the building, you know, traces of all sorts of things in that dust baggie, how do you know what was mixed with what? Mm-hmm. All right, good point. Let's talk about the other reasons that support your idea that something else happened, and then we need to talk about what that something else was. After this three-minute break, then we're going to take some phone calls from those of you out there who are 9-11 experts, if you would like to ask Dr. Wood a question or have a comment. She goes against the prevailing theory of what we've learned, even by 9-11 people. Doesn't go against, she says she uses her own documentation. Back in three minutes. Stay tuned. Come back to Power Hour. Thank you for joining us 33 minutes after the hour. This is Joyce Riley. Thank you for being part of the Power Hour today, part of the Power Hour team. We're talking to Dr. Judy Wood about 9-11. She has a different concept or different finding based on the documentation that she has, and she's all about evidence, and there's nobody that can not... appreciate that. Let me just remind you quickly, though, that we've got specials at the power hour. All the garden books are on special. All of them. There's lots of them. So take advantage of getting them from the power hour, please. If you're going to be doing a garden, getting started in growing, we've got all kinds of literature here. Also, I just need to remind everybody that we cannot do research for you. We have a lot of people that we'll call and say, would you look up such and such and tell me about this? Would you, you know, we try to be an answer, we try to be answers for you on subjects, but we can't do your research. We just can't. We don't have the people, the phone lines, those are for orders only. And then if you are asking your questions about whatever it is, then they can't take orders from other people, and they don't get their orders in, and they get upset. So that's order line only, the 877 number. Just remember,…