Dr. Judy Wood asks: Whoever planned 9/11, do you think they forgot to plan a cover-up? by @mestruth on 3Speak
- Source: At the 10:39:50 mark of the 9/11 Observable Evidence documentary - Telegram: - MES Links: --- ▶ Watch on 3speak.tv
Tags: #911truth #conspiracy #drjudywood #deepdives #controlledopposition #psyop #informationwar #technology #dew
Whoever planned 9-11, do you think it just slipped their mind and they forgot to plan a cover-up? Of course, they would plan a cover-up. So what would the cover-up look like? You know, there are going to be people asking questions and poking around. What do you do with those people? You round them up and contain them. Keep them out of trouble. I think that there are a lot of people in the truth movement who are not afraid of her work. and who would respond very positively to it. When we talk about the truth movement, I think we have to make a clear distinction between all those people who want to know the truth about 9-11, which includes me and you two as well. Everyone wants to know what really happened at 9-11, how it was done, who did it, and why is part of the truth movement. who acknowledges that the official story of Muslim hijackers is a lie, is part of the truth movement. The problem is not with people in the truth movement in general. The problem is with the designated leaders of the truth movement. They're the ones that are very much afraid of Dr. Woods' work, and there are any number of reasons for that being so. I'll just point out, too. which I consider to be glaringly obvious. First of all, the evidence that she presents and the case she bills on that evidence for what happened in terms of science at 9-11 at Ground Zero is irrefutable. And they are terrified of her evidence and her argument because they cannot refute it. They cannot, in a fair argument, refute what she says. And her evidence clearly refutes. the thermite-thermite theory of controlled demolition. So that's one reason why they're afraid. Another reason why they're afraid is because the designated leaders, that would be Gage and Jones, and the people who have clustered around them, have been hideously duped, and either they are pure dupes who've been caught in the Psiops of 9-11. or they are accomplices and accessories to that sciops, I couldn't really say. But they're either one or the other. And in that case, they certainly are afraid of anybody or anything who would expose that dupory. And so I think they're not just afraid. I think, if you'll pardon the allusion to this term, they're in terror. They have good reason to be. So that's my comment on why they're afraid of Dr. Wood's work. Indeed. Dr. Wood, do you like to add to that? Yes, I was looking at some various definitions. In various techniques that they try to cover it up, they don't want anyone to look at my book. My book is pure empirical evidence. and it leads to a conclusion that's conclusive evidence. And so, how do you cover that up? You call it a theory. You call it a theory, then you can say, oh, there's no evidence that supports her theories and speculation. Oh, theories, it's a favorite one. And I'd like to ask if by theory they mean speculation, because there's no speculation in my work. I build a case on evidence like a detective solving a crime. What I present as conclusive evidence, and being conclusive evidence, it puts an end to the debating by reason of irrefutability. That's what the meaning of the word conclusive is, serving by Webster Dictionary, serving to put an end to all debate and questioning. And so if... my evidence puts an end to all the debate and questioning, then what can they do with it? You know, the party's over. That's right. The party's over in terms of speculation, but the real party begins in terms of getting to the truth. And I couldn't agree with you more, Dr. Word, that truth unifies. When people accuse you of causing division in the 9-11 movement, that is absolutely ridiculous and irrational. slanderous and deceptive because you have produced pure evidence and the pure evidence leads us to the truth and the truth is what we all come together wrong. So it's 10 years down the road now and it's time to see if we can come together on 9-11 in the truth and not in speculations and theories. The moment has come to see if we can do that. The one thing I'd like to add is that I My definition of truth movement is more of this, you know, group because of how I've come to know it. I think if there's truth seekers and they're individuals, and, you know, they organize, the organization I refer to as the truth movement, but that's a definition difference. No, I follow that distinction. Right, I follow that distinction there, but there are many truth seekers who are quite willing to look at your work and who are impeded. by doing so by the designated leaders of the truth movement. There's been a lot of, I've kind of casually referred to them as defectors, you know, who are leaving the organized truth movement and realizing they've been duped. They've been led down a blind alley down to their dead-end street. And that's how cover-ups, I think, work. That is indeed how cover-ups work, yes. That's right. led to confusion, led into confusion, and then they're offered false solutions. This is how the sciops operates. There's an enormous sciops around 9-11, and I'm beginning to dawn on me now, as I've been paying closer and closer attention to Dr. Wood's work that on the scientific foundation that she's provided for the evidence of what was done and how it was done. From that foundation, we can start to look at the SIOPs that was built around it and start to deconstruct and break down the SIOP.