9/11 disinfo clown Webster Tarpley talks "space lasers" "beam theory" "men from Mars" "Holy Spirit" by @mestruth on 3Speak
The 9/11 DEW cover-up has been going on for decades now, as this 2007 clip showing Webster Tarpley out himself as a disinfo clown when asked about Dr. Judy Wood and Dr. Morgan Reynolds Qui Tam cour...
Tags: #911truth #conspiracy #dew #controlledopposition #psyop #deepdives #disinfo #informationwar #drjudywood
I'd like to know what your view is of Woods and Dr. Julie Woods, the material and Reynolds. And what's your view on the Ketam case? The what case? The Ketam case that the party is bringing with Woods, Julie Woods, Professor Judy Woods. I don't know what that is, so the second part I have no opinion, because I don't know what it is. Okay, Judy Woods, Dr. Judy Woods. Yes, I know her, but I don't know what this case is. Okay, she's basically just saying, the key time is basically about her, and Reynolds bringing a case which, their lawyer Lee part is spearheading, which is basically challenging NIST on their... well on their findings and basically say that, you know, they have defrauded and bringing in a case on that basis. But Judy Woods, as you, I'm sure know, is talking about directed energy weapons. I just wanted what your take was on that. Well, let's do the directed energy weapons first, the Judy Woods theory. I believe very strongly that research should be carried out. No research should be banned. You cannot ban any kind of research a priori. I've always argued for a separation of a research sphere from a political sphere. And what I think of as the political sphere is what you've seen. It has to do with, for example, using 9-11 and the road B-52 to get impeachment going. Because without 9-11 truth, You cannot defeat Bush politically. So I'm always in favor of a political sphere that is separate from a research sphere. For a lot of people in the United States, the research sphere is all there is. What do you think of the director of energy? I'm getting to it. But the political sphere for me is indispensable. Now, I would never say that I won't cooperate with somebody because they have a theoretical difference from me. I don't think it's possible to talk about men from Mars. I don't recommend blaming it on the action of the Holy Spirit, but as much as I like the Holy Spirit. But short of this, I would not have any preclusion. Now, concerning her theory, I think her theory is something that she has failed to prove. I don't see her successfully proving the beam theory. And I like Fetzer very much. and I try to cooperate with Fetzer on political matters, but I have that been convinced by the space laser or beam weapons or new physical principles argument. So what about the justification? So hang on. So I think it's fine for them to continue with this, but I think that you have to realize this is an unproven hypothesis. I think it is not wise if they get a chance to be on television. to make that the leading edge. I would not do that. And you can see what I think is important is Angel is next to the 25 drills. Now, in terms of the NIST, it's fine to do lawsuits against the NIST because they are lying, so I would support the lawsuit. The only problem you have in the United States is any recourse to the legal system is, it risks being futile, in the broad sense. because you have so many fascist judges. We have a fascist majority on the U .S. Supreme Court. It's Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts, with Kennedy usually joining in, and that's basically a fascist or quasi-neophascist majority. So I don't know how you can expect to get anywhere in the federal court system. As long as you're doing that propagandistically, it's fine, but I would not make that into something that eats up all your... or your resources. So again, I would say they should continue their research if that's what they want to do. I don't condemn them, but I think they haven't succeeded in proving it. Right, have you, have you made it with the evidence? Is it one question the person, please? I just wanted if you've seen any of the evidence, because she is a racist person. Yes, I guess at it. Again, there is the possibility of an unexplained residue in 9-11. In other words, there's... It's not the case that everything has been explained, but again, the problem is they have not proven what they're sustained, and I think it is unwise for them to rush that into the foreground and make that the be -all and end-all, and then try to say to other people that they want to cooperate with them if they don't share this, although I don't know if they do that, but I think you have to realize, the political work has got to get done. Because the overriding question here is World War III. So what are you doing to stop World War III? And the tactics have to somehow be in relation to this World War III question.