9/11 disinfo bandcamp leader David Hughes pushes the bogus "cold fusion mini nuke" theory by @mestruth on 3Speak
9/11 disinfo bandcamp leader David Hughes copies the Fetzer playbook almost exactly by saying that 9/11 involved the use of "cold fusion mini nukes" because material appeared to "eject upwards and ...
Tags: #911truth #conspiracy #davidhughes #disinfo #controlledopposition #deepdives #informationwar #dew #drjudywood
My personal view at least, I don't think that whatever destroyed the Twin Towers was aerial. The space beam's slur is often used against Dr. Wood, but, you know, I debunked that slur in my writings. If you think back to the image I showed of the buildings turning to powder and some of the material being ejected upwards as well as outwards, that to me would suggest that the direction of the force being applied was upwards actually, not downwards. So I think there's different technologies probably at play here. And just in terms of that image again, I mean, this would seem to be consistent with the idea of some kind of cold fusion mini nuke, potentially. That's an idea which I don't think anyone has ever proposed, but it's kind of where I sit with this. And one of the problems with the 9 -11 Truth community is it's divided very rigidly into camps. And so you have people in the mini -nukes camp and, you know, they viciously attack everyone else. And then you have people in the nanothermite camp and they make up lies about everybody else. And then you have people in the Dr. Wood camp who won't hear a single bad word said against her and are completely shut off to all of the other camps. And so it becomes very hardened and not actually very productive. But... The way I look at it, and this is why I quite like the work of Heinz Pomer, even though I disagree with him on temperatures, is that some of the evidence that POMmer provides does actually appear to be consistent with some kind of mini nuclear weapon in terms of the dust clouds and the rocket trails and other visible evidence. But at the same time, we know it was cold. And so that would point in the direction, in my opinion, of some kind of cold fusion. Mini Nuuk. Now, again, that probably puts me in a minority of one, but I don't care. That's the way it appears to me. Well, that's also smarter if it's N and N, then you have all these factions fighting, and it's probably multiple technologies that were being deployed. So Judy Wood also presents this hurricane theory, but you dismissed this. Yeah, so, I mean, this is one example of, you know, despite the fact I defend the fundamentals of Wood's work and, you know, understand the pivotal importance of it. I don't go along with absolutely everything that she says, just because she's Judy Wood. And there are two areas in particular where I disagree with her, and it really doesn't matter because, as I say, 98% of the material, I think, is solid. But just for the record, it's Hurricane Earin. And again, all of this is in my presentation and my article. I don't think that Hurricane Ehrin actually had anything to do with the destruction of the Twin Towers. And the magnetometer data that would presents as well, I don't think actually bears any meaningful relation to the destruction of the buildings. But as I say, these are relatively minor points. The key evidence is what I presented earlier and what I'm entirely on board with.