Étude de l’Apocalypse – #7 : Le cavalier au cheval blanc | le 1er sceau de l'apocalypse by @lebereenp on 3Speak
▶️ Watch on 3Speak --- Cette vidéo examine en profondeur la figure du cavalier au cheval blanc et explique pourquoi son interprétation traditionnelle dans la chrétienté est erronée. (This video tak...
Tags: #apocalypse #revelation #prophtie #prophecy #bible
Hello to all, and welcome to these studies on the book of the Apocalypse. We have already been advanced, and today we are we in so, the so of the book that is celted. And we're going to start, after having seen the introduction, we'll be able to open the first so. So, so we're So, the introduction, we have, we had, we made to understand that we were in a scene of judgment, that the beings living of the throne, that we made understand by rapport to their relations with the different cavaliers that we were in the mission, and that this mission was essential, by which is transmitted by the throne central, to Jesus Christ, because the mission, permit that the names are inscribed in the books, and the names that are inscribed in the from 1844. This is all that we have been able to see and to make in advance, at So, today, we have some elements that we can make to say that the open of so, the four first are linked to the mission, and the three last are rather attached to judgment. So, so today, it is time for us to start for us, be, be, the So, uparavans, I have a way my moanetectic, which permit to be a little more easily, to what can correspond the different cavaliers of the book, Celé, of the Apocalypse. For the Cavalier Blanc, we'll say that he respond to the question who? For the Cavalier Roo, he And for the Cavalier Noir, he responds to the question, what, in the sense positive? The Cavalier, on the Cheval-Verve-Varer, respond to the question what, in the sense negative? It's a medium-technic, you'll see by the So, we'll start by the first Cavalier, today, the Cavalier to Cheval Blanc. What we do? What we do, the book of the Apocalypse, on this first cavalier? Apocalypse, chapter 6, at the part of the verse 1, I, I, when the an a gnaut was overy one of seven soe, and I'd I regarded, and here, paruas, paru a cheval -blanc. The one who he had an ark. A coroner, he partied in vincere, and for vince. Here's for what he is the text. And now, for the cavalier to cheval-blanc. So, all of the chevalier to cheval-blanc. So, all, I prefer to Here is what is said, of order general, on the cavalier-o-cheval-Bal-Blan. Of what I know, there are maybe some version that I know not, but in the ensemble, it's regrouped in the manner suvents. So, certain say that this cavalier-o-cheval -blanc, is Satan. It's not very rependue, but it exists. What is the most rependue, is the second proposition, is to say that this cavalier to Sheval Blanc, is Jesus Christ. So, all first, so, so cavalier, to Sheval Blan, is he, Satan? So, it is to recognize that in the book of the Apocalypse, Jesus is announced, as the grand vincere, And in fact, the suite of the text, in the book of the Apocalypse, no cess to confirm the victory of Jesus Christ and, finally, the defeat of Satan. So, I've taken the verse 17. Apocalypse chapter 1, verse 17, so now we are well at the at his feet as mort. He posa on me his hand right, in saying, Necray a point. I am the first and the last, and the vivant. I was, I am alive, and I am I, I am living, the life, I am I, the even if the word victor or a veneer, an appare not. I'm for proof, a corinthian, chapter 15, verse 55, O mort, where is your victory? O mort, where is your ghouillon? The iguion of the more, is the ghouon, and the puissance of the So, in the Declaration of Apocalypse 1, verse 17, Jesus Christ, when he says that he takes the key of the morgue of the Sejour of Demor, he's announced in vincor on the condemnation of the Pichet, Don Satan is the Pair. 2nd text. Apocalypse chapter 5, verse 5, we say, and one of the here the lion of the Tribute of Judah, the rejolet of David, has beencue for open the book, and it's seven so. So, Apocalypse 5, the scene that we interest, in fact, before even the opening of the show, Jesus Christ recuperer the book, and he recuperer this book in quality of a vincor. And this is also confirmed, by Apocalypse 12 verse 7, which is the last passage that I've chosen, and there was war in the sky. Michel and his angels combattied against the dragon, and the dragon and his angels combattir, but they were not the more strong, and it was precipitated, the grand dragon, the serpentian, called the devil and Satan, the He was precipitated on the earth, and these angels were precipitated with him, because he has been precipitated, the accusator of our frere, who, who he was accused, before our God, day and night. They've been vanqued, because of the son of the anew, and a cause of the power of their testimony. And they've not evened their life, just to which is the serpent-an, so we precise that it's the devil and satan, and there, he is presented as being the grand perdant of this affair. So, the ensemble of these texts, the fact that even that the because Jesus Christ is announced as the grand vincere. Rends difficult, rends efficiently, the proposition, that this Cavalier Blanc was Satan, especially that he is presented as being a vincor and as partan to wincres. It would be a counter to win. It would be a contrast, it would be a in the context, which is there the book of the Apocalypse. It's a bit probable. The second hypothesis, Jesus. So, it's a bit complicated, because all our demonstration to demonstrate that Satan, not be this cavalier, by All of our demonstration repose on the fact that it's Jesus Christ, who is presented as a vicarer. So, normally, Jesus Christ, would be the grand favorite for being this cavalier, to Sheval Blanc. But I will invite to take in count certain aspects. Apocalypse, chapter 6, verse 1, and 2. who we talk of the cavallo, cheval-blanc, we say a certain number of things. When the Agneau opened one of the seven so, and I've heard one of the four -etre-vivant, who'd say, like, of a tonnear, Vien, I'd have, and here, paru, a cheval -blank. It's that that we're interested. In fact, there, we're because we say that he talks like an voice of tonnear. So, now we are, in the intonation, in something that is quite serious. So, to say that this cavalier-o-sheval -blanc is Jesus Christ, it's, it's still to say that Jesus Christ. Who can really give des orders? I remember that Jesus is supposed to be sat sit on the throne, ported by the So even if there, he is presented as having received the book, in Apocalypse chapter 3, verse 21, he says, He will he will be, I will be assuar with me on my throne, like me I've been taken with my father on his throne. Normally, Jesus Christ is supposed to be ported on the throne by the earth living. And there, the beings are in trying to give an order to cabalier, to cheval So, if this cavalier is Jesus Christ, we're not even that, Jesus Christ, we're in a position of submission. It's not very coherent with the manner which he is presented in the Bible. By rapport to his victory and by the fact that he is presented in Jean Chabitrean as creator. Because the word, nothing has been said, because the And all that has been made, has been made by her and for her. And this parole has been made share. So, we understand that it's Jesus Christ. So, it's possible to assume this aspect of things, if we want to present Jesus as if we're presenting Jesus, as being the cavalier to Sheval Blanc. There is another aspect. In fact, we're is in trying to open the liro. And he is in trying to open the first so. So, that wouldre do you know, that Jesus Christ, so it would be at two places in the same time, in this scene. So, the Apostre Jean, would be in trying to see Jesus Christ, open the book, and in the same time, he will be Jesus Christ, So, Jesus occupier two places in the same scene. I would have to be justified, also. There are other elements. In John, chapter 16, verse 7, Jesus has been clear on a point. So, but I'm I will be it. So, Jesus Christ, at the end of his ministry terrestrial, had been announced that it had been that he had to go for that his successor came. And he had even made in advance the fact that his successor was, he was more advantageous for us, that he left the place to this successor, the in fact, of these virtues that we would be utiles for the suite. Well, the earth that the Saint-Espry would accomplish for help to help me, in fact, all what Jesus Christ had done during his ministry. So, Jesus Christ, is mounted to the sky, and he is rested from it, because now we have a other consolator. There is a other aspect, and I think that's the last. In fact, I'm not found in the Bible, of texts that talk of a coroner of Jesus Christ. So, Jesus Christ is presented as a king. He's presented he himself as a royal, at Pilate. But, in fact, we don't I've been found these texts where Jesus Christ were coroned, even one where he had several crowns, but we don't know never, in the Bible, in So I will read, The soldiers of the governor, conduised Jesus in the pretoire, and they assembled around him, all the court. He loathe his vestments, and he covered, and the coverer an mantle, eccarlate. He trussed a crown of epine, that he poser on his head, and he put a rooseau in the right, then, he, he, raily, in saying, and he crached against him, prone the roseau, and frapped on his head. After being socky mocker to him, he uttered the mantle, he remir his vets, and he'd emmeneer for the crucify. The sole text that I've put to find, the sole text, that I've put in the Bible, where he is mentioned that Jesus is coroner, is concerning Jesus Christ. And that, he has been in being conscious. So, the cavalier-o-cheval-blanc, he is crowned, there. But in the Bible, there, but in the Bible, there, there is not in a phase of being crowned. So, all these texts me show that Jesus Christ, is not the cavalier of the Cheval Blanc. So, the question demur, because these two versions, in fact, especially the version of Jesus, is the version the And as you've been to see, it's heurte, has, a kind of some difficulties major, by rapport to the ensemble of the texts biblique, who are presented there. So, now, let's see what, who can be this Cavalier Blanc? This Cavalier, pardon, on Cheval Blanc. So we'll for this, pass in review the order and the line of order. So I'll do it only time, I'll do for the Cavalier Blanc, but in fact, this regle, this subject is valid for all the sooth, in fact, all the so that and by rapport to the arc. We'll then, the color of the cheval, the color blanche of the cheval. And we'll veron, for terminate, the explication, by rapport to the head of the lion, of the human, who command this cheval. So, we're is ready to start the study, appropriately d 'et, on the cavalier, on Sheval Blanc. The order is the line of order, what I mean by that. It would say by that. It would be perhaps that I'd probably that I'd to affirmed that the being a man, and the man, and the man, the manned, the cavalier, to cheval-blanc. Because, in fact, when we talk, when we talk of SOT and of Lent, we don't know that it's the SOT and Lentre VIVAN, we don't know that it's the And, the same for the second so, we do that it's the second, being, and the second, and the third and the fourth-yme. So, in fact, the fact that we're limit the term the first, it's a certain reticence to certain person who explain the soe, who explain the so, for affirming that it's being the of the Cavalier, to Sheval Blanc. But, but it is to know one thing. The beings are presented in Apocalypse 4, verse 7, with the terms L-Etruevon, is the second, because the word that is used in Greek, is detheros. So, the second, the other of two, that's what means deuteros. And for the third, the word that's the word that is employed, is In the presentation of the Eter Vivant, we say that the Eklian is the 1st. We say that the living in the head of Ovo is the 2nd. We say that the man is the 3rd. And we say that the man is the 3rd, and we are the 4th. It's like that they are presented. And even if the fact that it's at the head of veaux, at the head of the head of the head of eagle -volent, no are not remancied at the moment of the open of the so, the order is repeated, he. So, then, we have not Protos for the first. We do just one of one of the The word de Teros is present. So, he is present two times. He is present for the being, and he is present for the soul. You know what? And, same for, well, the cavalier to cheval roo, and the So, yes, I affirm, I'm, I'm my lecture and it's my comprehension, I affirm that, effectively, it's been the first being the first man -evir-vivant, who command the first cheval, with his cavalier, the cavalier to cheval-blanc. This reasonment, this affirmation is supported by two things. By, at least two things. He is on the throne. He is presented as how? Apocalypse 4, verse 11. You are digned, our Lord and our God, to receive the glory and honor and the power, because you have created everything, and it's by your voluntet that exist and that they have been created. who can be venting to have so order than order than the creation. And, and, it's a theme, the creation, which is often used to say that God is a god of order. It's a first thing. Second element, Apocalypse 22. Verse 18 says, I declare, to whomcant the parol of the prophecy of this book, if someone he adds to something, God will frapper, de freo, decried in this book. And if someone retrench something of the words of this prophecy, God retrencher his part, of the Arbor of Vie, and of the Ville Sainte, decried in this book. So, there, we are with the book of the Apocalypse, in something where it the order that is made in place in the recipe that we used to know. We are very different, of Ezekiel chapter 1 and chapter 10, where, in fact, we have been seen that Ezekiel, when we have studied the Ezekiel, in the second presentation of the introduction, where there were these balbussimans, where there were some changement of view and opinion, even if Ezekiel There is a 3rd and the last argument, the explanations that will come when we're going to study the open of the 1st 1st 1st, will you show, in all who talks at the venue, the Cavalier Cheval Blanc. The Cavalier to Cheval Blanc. And idem, for what he sui. So, that for what I had to say, on the order and the line of order. And this is a, I'm, I use as something an established, in my lecture and in the explanations that I give on the SOU. So, we can pass to point So we'll start by the crown and the victory. So I regarded, and here, by a cheval -blanc. Thee, he loomtee with an arque, a crown, a crowned, and he partied in vinker and for vink. So, it's a text that is a and it's easy to, to understand. And that's what we'll see now. So, concerning the crown. We have a text in Corinthian, chapter 9, verse 24 and verse 25, which is as well new, and who is useful. Do you know if you not, that those who go in the stadium, go all, but can only reemper the price? All those who combate, simpose all species of abstinence, and they do for obtain a coroner corruptible, but we, do it for a coroner incorruptible. The notion of coroner is not uncommoned for the Lecter Biblical, and it concerns the pretendant to Salue. It's important to the It's more important to know, by rapport to what the Apocalypse says to this subject. Let's two texts. The message, the message, to the church. Apocalypse chapter 2, verse 10, we say, So, be fidel to the death, and I'd be the crown of life. That's what Jesus says, to members of the church of Smyrne. In Apocalypse, chapter 3, verse 11, Jesus Christ, Lord, say, to the member of the church of Philadelphia, I come, soon, retient what you have, so that you have, so that person do bring your crown. So, so that's interesting, at various levels. of two corons different. At the first iglise, at Smyrne, Jesus Christ, talks of the corin of life. And he said, I'd tell them, so they don't have two coroners. He does the promise of a crown future. And he called this crown, the to the Church of Philadelphia, they they're they're don't a crown. They have a crown. But the mention that they're given, is to it, is to retain. So, they have a crown, certainly, but they do not have not to have it. It's Especially, that he's address in the two cases, to an church, to one of these churches. And we know that God does acception of person. So, God has not a double discourse. What he promise to one, is the same thing that he promise to others. But, now we are well in a variant. So, it means that there is a reason to this variant. and it's interest in a way particular. So, let's see we to understand what he's going to understand what he's So, a courant of life, is something that is definitive. But, he said to those of Philadelphia who come after, that, they have, they have a crown, but that's a crown, it's not a coron of life, it's a crown to protect. So for them, it is possible that it's been lost, so that is not the case of Smyrne. So, the question logic, is, between the time of the Echise of Smyrne and the time of the Gegis of Philadelphia, for that those of Smyrne, they, is a promise of courn of life, and that those of Philadelphi, they are a crown to protect. And, it's that between the two, there is an event-clay that's produced. The moment of judgment, which has started in 1844. Smirn is, so, an eglise, who has been in 1844. By count, Philadelphia is a church, rather of the end of the time of time, after 1844. So, that means, that are certainly already dead. So, they have been fidele to the death. So, at the judgment, they are dead in the fidelity. Jesus Christ is in a way, there to their don't know the crown of life. In the measure where they are dead and they have been fidele to the So, they receive a crown of life. But, those of Philadelphia, they, as the judgment has already commenced, when they're preysm, they are inscribed in the level of life, so they are in measure to receive a This crown there, he risk to it to lose, because it is possible to efface a name that has been inscribed. So, there, we're talking to those who are living. After, the judgment of 1844, which has started in 1844. So, we'll see this, but by rapport to our the fidele of Smyrne, well, Jesus Christ, they're made the promise of a courant of a life. So, he does this promise, so that they're going to live before 1844. So, he does this promise, and that's before 1844, but from 1844, this promise can pass to the reality. So, in fact, they're Their courant of life, the judgment has commenced. And we can start by them, because they've been fidele to the death, and they'll change more the life. By course, before 1844, the churches that have existed after 1844, those, which is part Smyrne, which is part in Philadelphia, It's a crown, attention, to protect, because, yes, you're inscribed in the Livre of Life, but you can also reject the Salue that you have accepted at an epoch. By contrast, when the member of Philadelphia deced, at this moment, if he is rest in the fidelity, he is in measure, he, to receive, a during his time of life, after 1844. Here's what what he's going to this famous crown. Here's the explanation, concerning the first cavalier, which he is said that he is a vincereuror, and that he He is a vincere when he represents the members of the Eglies of before 1844. When he represent the members of the Eglies that have existed before 1844, he arrives in a vincor. And the crown that he receives is a crown, well, a in terms of its representatitit, of members of Eglise Fidel, of 1844. But it is also representative of the members of the Gleys, after 1844. So, it is concerning, he receives a crown, but a He part for Vincre. So, we have here a cavalier to Cheval Blanc, a cavalier-o-Schvall-Belan, which is at the time representative of the churches, such as the Eglies of Smyrne, so, before 1844, and representative of the possibility. So, the two receive a crown, so the cavalier-o-cheval-blanc, resohn, in as a to be able to understand. So, here for the explication of the coronel, and of the fact of being a vinker, and to part for to winch. So, we can pass now, the point The Ark of the Cavalier.…
@joythewanderer: Wake up: Hive is basically a cartel playground. They're printing 6–7 figure salaries for themselves every day from that endless inflation. Power down. Sell some. Take profits. Liquidity = freedom. You never go broke taking gains. You're welcome.