MES Livestream 23: Refutation of Explosive Demolition by 9/11 Revisionist

0.258

Open in the desktop app ADD TO PLAYLIST

Published on Jul 11, 2024

About :

9/11 Revisionist joins the show to provide a special presentation refuting 10 points of contention made by 9/11 explosive demolition (and thermite / nukes) believers.

February 10, 2024 Saturday at 1 PM PST / 3 PM CST / 4 PM EST / 11 PM CAT

9/11 Revisionist Links:

Substack: https://substack.com/@911revision
X: https://x.com/911Revisionist
Telegram: https://t.me/Sept11_Deprogramming
Odysee:https://odysee.com/@911revisited:7
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/groups/879905060007964
Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2588430
Email: revisionof911@gmail.com

Time Stamps:

0.) Intro: 0:00

This is the initial background on 9/11 and then perception management. 5:30. Timestamp 5 min 30

Below is the points raised against DEW, with my reply and reference to Dr Wood’s book and the discussion in the presentation with a timestamp for the full 4 hours broken down…

1.) Debris Pile Height: The claim of a too-low debris pile is debunked by recognizing that 90% of the Twin Towers' mass fell outside their footprints. 35:23
Chapter 9 - Pages 171 to 196 (Timestamp 35 min23 to 57 min30)

2.) Damage to Core Box Columns: DEW would need precise targeting features, making it implausible for the observed straight and horizontal breaks in core columns. 57:30
Chapter 12 - Pages 247 to 256 (Timestamp 57min30 to 1h12:33)

3.) Fall of the "Spire": The assertion that steel "turned to dust" is challenged by the spire falling after being "shaken," likely by explosive charges. 1:12:33
Chapter 8 - Pages 131 to 169 (Timestamp 1h12:33 to 1h31:30)

4.) "Toasted" Tops of Vehicles: Damage to vehicles is explained by partially unignited thermite falling through the air, not by DEW. 1:31:30
Chapter 11 - Pages 213 to 246 (Timestamp 1h31:30 to 1h48:30)

5.) Once-Molten Iron Microspheres: The presence of molten iron spheres is explained by thermitic materials, not addressed by the DEW hypothesis. 1:48:30
Chapter 15 - Page 321 to 339 (Timestamp 1h48:30 to 1h54:32)

6.) Molten Metal: DEW cannot explain observations of molten metal pouring from WTC 2 with temperatures exceeding those from jet fuel or office fires. 1:54:32
Chapter 17 - Pages 349 to 394 (Timestamp 1h54:32 to 2h13:23)

7.) Active, Unignited Nano-Thermite: Discovery of nano-thermite in the dust supports the explosive/incendiary hypothesis, not explained by DEW. 2:13:23
Chapter 7 - Pages 122 to 130 (Timestamp 2h13:23 to 2h21:08)

8.) Persistent Extreme Heat: High temperatures at Ground Zero contradict DEW proponents' denial of such temperatures. 2:21:08
Chapter 13 - Pages 257 to 296 (Timestamp 2h21:08 to 2h47:56)

9.) Craters Observed in WTC 5 and 6: Holes in WTC 5 and 6 are attributed to falling steel, not exotic weaponry as suggested by DEW proponents. 2:47:56
Chapter 10 - Pages 197 to 212 (Timestamp 2h47:56 to 3h08:15)

10.) Eyewitness Accounts of Multiple Explosions and Building 7: Numerous eyewitness accounts align with controlled demolition, not explained by the DEW hypothesis. 3:08:15
Chapter 7 - Pages 95 to 130 - Timestamp 3h08:15 to 3h23:07 (Building 7 mentioned as well)

Then for some closing thoughts… 3:23:07
Timestamp 3h23:07 to 3h56:15

Stream notes and playlist: